UNIONIST Kevin Hague has blocked a top Scottish columnist after clashing over Scotland's economy.
Hague, from pro-Union think tank These Islands, blocked Iain Macwhirter after tweeting about his column which said the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures don't reflect a true picture of the country's finances.
In an article in The Herald titled "GERS should be renamed TWITS: too wee; too poor; too stupid", Macwhirter wrote: Suddenly, independence doesn't seem such an expensive luxury ... GERS is, if anything, an index of dependency: a measure of how Scotland has lost out being a backwater of the UK, not a country with the economic powers – tax, borrowing, debt – required to run a national economy.
"But even then, as the tax expert Professor Richard Murphy has pointed out, it is absurd to claim, as GERS has in recent years, that Scotland with 8% of the UK population accounts for nearly 60% of the entire UK deficit. This just doesn't make sense."
READ MORE: Former Unionist dog food seller clashes with Andrew Wilson over GERS figures
Hague said Macwhirter's argument is "ignorant nonsense", adding: "I don’t know which is more remarkable - that people get paid to write ignorant nonsense like this, or that people pay to read it.
"Depresses the hell out of me that sentient beings can read this and find it persuasive."
. @iainmacwhirter (the author of this piece) knows he’s spinning a deceit because the simple maths behind “percentages of a total made up of differences” has been explained to him many times (perhaps in the most pedestrian manner possible by me, here >https://t.co/tqV5Kskknd)
— Kevin Hague (@kevverage) September 2, 2020
Macwhirter hit back, saying Hague missed the point of the article.
He tweeted: "This is just offensive Kevin. You ignore the point of my piece , and my responses to your posts. These eccentric GERS figures, whatever they mean, tell us nothing about the viability of a Scottish economy - only that it is clearly not thriving in the U.K."
This is just offensive Kevin. You ignore the point of my piece , and my responses to your posts. These eccentric GERS figures, whatever they mean, tell us nothing about the viability of a Scottish economy - only that it is clearly not thriving in the U.K. https://t.co/HtnfSDxM60
— Iain Macwhirter (@iainmacwhirter) September 2, 2020
Hague blocked Macwhirter instead of responding.
Sad but to be expected. He really is his own worst enemy. Calling me names and then running away. pic.twitter.com/yEbQGTv02r
— Iain Macwhirter (@iainmacwhirter) September 2, 2020
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel