SCOTTISH police officers have been spat at twice as often than normal during the coronavirus pandemic, it has emerged.
Speaking before the justice sub-committee on policing, Scotland's highest ranking officer told MSPs that spit hoods could be used to stop such incidents occurring and he wanted to ensure their continued availability to protect his officers.
While he did not offer specifics, Chief Constable Iain Livingstone told the committee incidents where a member of the public has spat on a police officer have more than doubled since March.
Human rights body Amnesty International raised concerns about the use of spit hoods, but Livingstone said their use could ensure the safety of officers on the front lines.
"No member of Police Scotland, whether a police officer or police staff, should expect or tolerate being spat upon in the course of their duties," he said.
"Spit hoods are available, they will be used by officers and staff using their own judgment when it's clear somebody is spitting upon them.
"What's happened, over the course of the Covid period, is a very small minority being aggressive and trying to fight officers, and instances of spitting have more than doubled over the Covid period.
"I think inevitably, the use of spit hoods will have increased."
The chief constable said that the hoods are used in "significantly less than 1%" of the instances of someone being taken into custody, but added that - despite the low numbers - he would "insist" they were made available to staff and officers to protect them.
With Covid-19 being transmitted through droplets in the air passed between an infected person and others, spitting could potentially result in an officer getting infected.
In a submission by Police Scotland to the committee before Livingstone's appearance, it said that 203 staff and officers have tested positive for Covid-19 from more than 1,900 tests.
Officers are able to be tested if they have symptoms or if they believe they may have been in contact with someone who has Covid-19.
Addressing the statistics, Livingstone said: "We are going to continue to allow the asymptomatic testing that we've introduced.
"If any member of staff or any police officer has concerns, we'll provide access to that and we'll also - where necessary - provide that support to their families."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel