THE most important thing about GERS is that it includes all spending with any kind of bearing on Scotland but only includes taxation which can be shown to arise directly inside Scotland. There is inconsistency and inherent bias towards a Scottish deficit.
The second most important thing is that, with a single exception, all the spending figures have been collected inside the UK machine already, and for purposes other than the generation of accurate statistics for Scotland. There are more than two dozen of such sources, and each is put together with the others to produce a Scottish total.
READ MORE: GERS figures lead to incorrect threats of austerity in indy Scotland
To give a practical example, the two aircraft carriers built at Rosyth count for Scottish spending while construction is completed. But they will also count for Scottish spending during the next 50 years while they (probably) have US bases in the South China Sea.
No other country in the world would tolerate it. I wish Scotland would just announce an end to this practice and take whatever Unionist flak is coming its way.
That certainly would be better than lending any further credence to an annual ritual that has only ever been meant to discredit the idea of Scottish independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel