EVEN No voters think Scotland would have been to able cope with the coronavirus crisis better if it was an independent country, Professor Sir John Curtice has said.
Speaking on Times Radio, the polling guru said that while Brexit meant rising support for a Yes vote pre-dated the pandemic, perceptions of Nicola Sturgeon's handling of coronavirus were "frankly close to being sky high".
The Strathclyde University academic said unionists should "have been worried about the opinion polls for quite a while, not waiting till July, which seems to be the position of the UK Government."
He told the show's host, Calum Macdonald, that the covid crisis is "the most important public policy that the devolved Scottish Government has had to deal with" in the last 21 years.
"Perceptions of Nicola Sturgeon's handling of coronavirus are frankly close to being sky high.
"Her personal standing, more broadly now in terms of how well she's doing as First Minister, is as high as it's been since he became first became First Minister back in the back end of 2014.
"Meanwhile, Boris Johnson is just frankly thought to have handled coronavirus badly. And it looks as though - although this is somewhat more circumstantial - given that also when you ask people whether or not an independent Scotland would have handled coronavirus better, even amongst No voters, there's about 20% who say, 'actually, I think it would have done'.
"It looks as though what's happened in the last three months is that some people say 'well actually you know what, I think maybe an independent Scotland might be able to govern itself a bit better.
"And that's just added another three or 4% to the 50% that was already there.
"So it's basically a two part story. Brexit, is the thing that as it were, that created the hole in the damn and coronavirus is what enabled quite a few more voters to rush through the hole that was created."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel