NICOLA Sturgeon has said she was not aware of female civil servants being advised not be alone with her predecessor Alex Salmond.
But she said MSPs probing the Scottish Government’s handling of sexual harassment allegations made against the former first minster were “perfectly entitled” to take up this issue.
She vowed she herself was “absolutely committed to fully complying with the inquiry”. Her comments came after concerns were raised about “huge swathes” of information provided by the Scottish Government being “heavily redacted”.
The First Minister was pressed on the issue after the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints held its first evidence session on Tuesday – with the country’s most senior civil servant, Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans, being questioned under oath.
At that hearing, Evans said she could not comment on claims female civil servants were advised not to be alone with the former first minister.
Raising the issue at First Minister’s Questions, Tory Murdo Fraser asked if the First Minister was “herself aware of female civil servants being given that advice?”
She told him: “No, I wasn’t.”
While committee convener SNP MSP Linda Fabiani prohibited further questioning on the issue on Tuesday, Sturgeon said the matter was “something the committee itself is perfectly entitled itself to take up”. She added that Evans was “happy to write to the committee to address this issue, if the committee wishes”.
READ MORE: BBC defends Kirsty Wark's Alex Salmond show in wake of bias complaints
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie noted the First Minister had previously pledged to “co-operate fully” with the inquiry – which was launched after the Court of Session ruled the way the Government dealt with the complaints was “unlawful”.
Baillie said: “Given that swathes of documents are heavily redacted and the Scottish Government is refusing access to key documents relating to the core of the inquiry’s remit, I hope the First Minister will want to stand by her earlier commitment.”
She called on Sturgeon to “instruct the full co-operation that is currently missing from the Scottish Government”.
The First Minister said: “I am absolutely committed to fully complying with the inquiry. I will personally attend the committee to answer questions when I am asked to do so. “ She pledged she would “answer all questions that are put to me when the committee asks me to do, unless of course they asking me questions that my answers would breach legal requirements”.
She said she had already submitted written evidence – saying it was for the committee to decide “when and to what extent” this is made public.
She continued: “I have also, given part of the committee remit is to look at my conduct, I have recused myself from any decision-making in terms of the Government’s interaction with the committee.”
For this reason, she said, she was not going to issue instructions, but added: “The Government will continue to fully co-operate, I am sure, and within the legal obligations that the Government operates under make available the maximum amount of information it can to the committee.”
Sturgeon insisted she was “respecting every aspect of this committee’s work” as she criticised Fraser, saying “within hours” of Tuesday’s meeting he had issued a press release “accusing me of not being forthcoming”.
As a result, she said: “I think he should perhaps consider that himself before he ask me who intends fully to respect every aspect of this committee’s work.”
The Tories are asking Evans to return to the inquiry, which resumes taking evidence on Tuesday.
They have written to the head of the UK civil service, Sir Mark Sedwill, to ask if Evans broke the Civil Service Code by refusing to Fraser’s question.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel