HOME Secretary Priti Patel has said migrants are crossing the Channel to Britain because they believe France is a “racist country” where they may be “tortured”.
According to reports, Patel made her comments in a conference call with Conservative MPs concerned about the recent upsurge in numbers attempting the dangerous voyage in small boats.
The news emerged as more migrants, including a young child, were taken ashore in Dover by the Border Force on Sunday, adding to 65 who were taken to the UK on Saturday.
Government sources said Patel had made clear that she did not share those views and was simply explaining the “pull factors” which led so many migrants to risk their lives in this way.
One MP on the call told The Sun on Sunday: “Priti was asked why the migrants are so desperate to leave France and come here. She told us some believe racism to be an issue.
“They claim they feel discriminated against when, for example, looking for work in France. Others claimed they feared being tortured if they stayed in France or Germany.
“Priti stressed that she didn’t believe any of this to be true. She was merely trying to explain the pull factors.”
However, another MP on the call was quoted as saying that she had left an impression that she did believe the French were racist.
“She was calling them racist and she is right. They are more racist than us,” the MP told The Sunday Times.
READ MORE: 'This is perverse voyeurism': BBC under fire for channel crossing report
A Home Office spokesman said the UK was working with the French authorities to stem the small boat crossings.
However, the spokesman said the Government had limited scope for action until the Brexit transition period comes to an end at the end of the year.
“The Home Secretary is clearly frustrated by the increasing number of small boats crossing the Channel – this is compounded by the fact we are currently restricted in our response by EU regulations,” the spokesman said.
“That is why the Home Secretary is committed, along with other government departments and No 10, to have legislation ready following the end of the transition period.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel