THE devolved nations must not be shut out from Downing Street plans for a post-Brexit internal market, MSPs have said.
Holyrood representatives also criticised the UK Government’s proposals, which have been condemned as a power grab, for lacking detail.
The Westminster Government wants to establish a new internal market between the four nations at the end of the Brexit transition period, but the Scottish Government says "every devolved power could be undermined" by the proposals.
Holyrood's Finance and Constitution Committee has been hearing evidence on the plans and has now written to the Tory Business Secretary urging "mutual trust and respect for the existing constitutional arrangements".
READ MORE: UK Government blows off MSPs 36 minutes before power grab meeting starts
Responding to the UK Government's white paper consultation, committee convener Bruce Crawford criticised the lack of detail about a new trade framework and claimed there was "little scope for meaningful engagement".
Business Secretary Alok Sharma declined to give evidence to the committee about the plans, but a UK Government spokeswoman previously claimed the proposed internal market "will ensure the free flow of goods and services across every part of the UK, while upholding the devolution settlement".
Arguing EU-controlled powers will be transferred to the devolved administration, she added: "This will give the devolved administrations power over more issues than they have ever had before, without removing any of their current powers."
On behalf of the committee, Crawford insisted new structures must not be imposed without devolved governments' agreement because "trade-offs and balances are involved in making an internal market".
He said: "There is an onus on all four governments and legislatures across the UK to work constructively together to seek a solution to this complex and challenging issue.
"This must be achieved through mutual trust and respect for the existing constitutional arrangements within the UK.
"In particular – as this committee has emphasised on numerous occasions – the UK Government, post-Brexit, must respect the devolution settlement.
"There must be a transparent and inclusive public debate on the white paper proposals which allows all interested parties and the wider public to contribute.
"The significance of the proposals for all citizens across the UK means that the solution cannot be left to the UK Government to decide.
"A consensus needs to be achieved and this requires a much longer, inclusive and more detailed debate than what is currently being proposed."
Giving evidence about the proposals on Wednesday, Michael Russell accused Boris Johnson of "running a clear and deliberate anti-devolution policy".
Scotland’s Constitution Secretary said the proposed legislation considers Westminster to be sovereign in trade and regulation disputes, and the UK Government "have a veto on everything".
Warning the Scottish Government is considering legal action to challenge the plans, he said: "This is an outrageous power grab and it is a major weakening of devolution, and it should not be permitted to take place.
"My view is that it reveals completely the agenda of the current UK Government, which is hostile to devolution and hostile particularly to Wales and Scotland for exercising their rights under devolution."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel