RUTH Davidson’s big return to frontline politics saw her forced to defend her decision to take a job-for-life at the unelected House of Lords.
During a heated exchange at First Minister’s Questions, the soon-to-be Baroness insisted she was simply going to “another parliament.”
The former Scottish Tory leader is temporarily fronting the party’s group in Holyrood following the ousting of Jackson Carlaw, and the uncontested election of Douglas Ross as leader.
Though it was claimed at the time that Carlaw had chosen to stand down of his own accord, there have been claims of a plot.
Last week, this paper revealed that Davidson and Ross met just days before their colleague decided the top job wasn’t for him.
READ MORE: Is this Daily Mail article more proof Douglas Ross is a front for Ruth Davidson?
During Thursday’s First Minister’s Questions, Davidson challenged Nicola Sturgeon over John Swinney’s handling of last week’s exam results.
The deputy First Minister, the peer-in-waiting said, was not being held accountable.
Responding, Sturgeon said: “In a few months, I will submit myself and my government to the verdict of the Scottish people in an election.
“That is the ultimate accountability for our record and our leadership.
“And as we do that. Ruth Davidson will be pulling on an ermine and going to the unelected House of Lords.”
It wasn’t the SNP who were “running away from democratic accountability,” Sturgeon said.
A sheepish Davidson replied: “The former leaders of the Labour Party, The Scottish LibDems, the Scottish Conservative Party might want to go and serve in another Parliament, yes, and she thinks that that’s a bad thing”.
Sturgeon said she didn’t “criticise anybody for wanting to serve in any parliament”.
“I just have an old fashioned preference that they get elected,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel