THE furore and revised action over Scotland’s Highers results has raised opportunities to change the future. It has been distressing to witness young people thinking their life blighted. Some of the issues being discussed refer to the pandemic, but many relate to the old system of sifting young people into winners and losers. “If you don’t do it at 18, you’ve lost.” There is no need for this.
The #NoWrongPath movement encourages individuals to tell their unusual stories of progress and success to encourage others to strive for their dreams.
In 1984 I arrived in Bridgeton in Glasgow, from Brixton, South London (still talk like Michael Caine!) armed with my nursing and district nursing certificates and – as in the Goon’s sketch – my “two O Levels and a budgerigar!” I found opportunities, but also the need to be better qualified.
READ MORE: John Swinney: Talking to teens changed my mind on SQA affair
I took two Highers at night classes, before a degree at Stirling, with my clinical career. A chance to undertake research arose. Many adventures ensued – including the arrival of my children. I attained my PhD in 1997. After working as health care manager at Barlinnie, I became one of the nursing team at the University of the West of Scotland School of Health, Nursing & Midwifery. I retired as a professor.
There is an old myth in education, health and social care, that if you “open the flood gates” hundreds of inappropriate types will storm the ramparts and upset everything for all the nice proper types.
Having worked with the homeless, those with HIV, prisoners, research students and professionals, I have never found this to be the case. Most people, given the correct professional guidance and academic engagement, find their own level of place and involvement.
As an enthusiastic European London Scot, fortunate to live here, I am confident new paths can and will be created. The people’s skill base and political will in Scotland is second to none. Out of the terrible and disruptive experiences people of all ages have suffered this year, wouldn’t it be good if we made positive and beneficial change as well as rectifying this year’s results?
Professor John Atkinson
Bishopbriggs
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel