BORIS Johnson has been warned he risks "robbing a generation of young people of their future" unless "blatant injustice" in the English exams system is addressed.
Concerns have been raised by Labour that A-level and GCSE results could be downgraded for thousands of pupils across England because of the replacement grading system introduced post-lockdown.
Last month, exam regulator Ofqual confirmed that standardisation would draw on the historical outcomes of a centre.
On Monday, Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon apologised to pupils in the country who felt they had unfairly had their results downgraded, and today John Swinney announced a reversal of the policy.
All the Scottish pupils who were marked down by the SQA will have their grades withdrawn and replaced by the initial teachers’ estimates, the Education Secretary confirmed.
READ MORE: All pupils marked down by SQA to have their grades withdrawn
Labour has now urged the UK Government to carry out urgent changes to avoid making the same mistake south of the Border.
The party's proposals include helping students to correct their grades, with credible appeals and resits, as well as urgently clarifying which students are likely to be worst affected by the model being used.
It also says the Government should mandate greater flexibility in admissions decisions this year and ensure that no GCSE student will be moderated down to below a Grade 4 in English or maths.
Labour party leader Sir Keir Starmer said it was a "blatant injustice" that young people were having their futures decided by their postcode.
"Pupils and parents are rightly worried that years of hard work are about to be undone because a computer has decided to mark their child down," said the Labour leader.
"For too long, the Tories have considered the needs of young people as an afterthought when their needs should have been central.
"It's a blatant injustice that thousands of hard-working young people risk having their futures decided on the basis of their postcode.
"Unless Boris Johnson acts, he risks robbing a generation of young people of their future."
Green Party education spokesperson Vix Lowthion (above) said teachers should have been trusted in the grading process.
She said: "It has been an extremely difficult summer for schools, pupils and examiners, but basing grades on schools' past attainments will punish disadvantaged students and only widen inequalities in our society.
"This has not been a normal year and there is no point in pretending it has been.
"Instead, teachers should have been listened to and trusted.
"Teachers are the ones who know their pupils best and are most qualified to say how they would have achieved."
Lowthion added: "The current system looks arbitrary and unclear.
"This is not the time to be gambling with people's futures when so much is at stake, both for our young people and the country at large."
Liberal Democrat education spokesperson Layla Moran added: "Every individual should get the best start in life, whoever they are, whatever their background.
READ MORE: 'Covid shouldn't define them': Pupils and parents react to schools re-opening
"These predicted grades will have a lasting consequence on a young person's choices - that is why it's crucial [Education Secretary Gavin Williamson] steps in to ensure that no-one is disadvantaged by the pandemic or by their gender, ethnicity or socioeconomic status."
Meanwhile, students awaiting their A-level results in Wales will not be failed in the same way as their Scottish counterparts, the Welsh Government has insisted.
Minister Julie James said Wales used different modelling to Scotland and that nearly half of pupils' final mark was based on AS-levels completed last year.
This year's exams were cancelled across the UK because of the coronavirus lockdown and there are fears the replacement grading system will create a postcode lottery.
Speaking during the weekly Welsh Government briefing, James (below), minister for housing and local government, said she was confident pupils' grades would be "robust" due to the system used by exam board WJEC and exam regulator Qualifications Wales.
"I'm really happy to reassure every learner in Wales that the modelling in Wales is very different," she said.
"It takes into account work that has been completed by the students. For example, here in Wales we've never let go of AS-levels.
"If you took A-levels this year then you would have had your AS-level results last year and they contribute 40% to A-level grades.
"So, the model for standardising those grades are developed by the WJEC and approved by Qualifications Wales to ensure that learners are treated fairly and will be able to progress with confidence.
READ MORE: SNP insiders say John Swinney is ‘walking wounded’ over exam results
"We are obviously very keen that our learners are given the accolade they need for the hard work that they've done but also that they get the grades that they deserve, and that those grades are robust and will take them forward into their lives with confidence."
James said the Welsh Government had confidence in the assessments carried out by teachers and moderation was not a reflection of criticism.
"We're not expecting what happened in Scotland to happen here," she said.
"We absolutely do trust our teachers and our head teachers, in particular, have worked very hard throughout this process to make sure that their schools put forward the right results."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel