SCOTLAND'S largest teaching union has lodged grievances with two councils over what it claims are failures to facilitate phased returns of pupils.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) said the Scottish Borders and Moray local authorities have also failed to properly consult and reach agreement with it and other trade unions, in line with Scottish Government guidelines.
Pupils in the Scottish Borders returned to school on Tuesday, while they will be back in classrooms in Moray on Wednesday.
READ MORE: 'Covid shouldn't define them': Pupils and parents react to schools re-opening
The EIS said a lack of discussion around the flexibility of phased returns means staff are under "intense pressure" over schools reopening.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the union, said about 80% of its members have expressed "deep concerns" about safety over the re-opening of schools.
He said: "The recent EIS national survey indicated majority support from members for industrial action if required, to ensure the safety of staff and pupils in our schools.
"We will always seek to resolve collective grievances through dialogue but councils such as Scottish Borders need to engage with the EIS and not seek to bypass proper discussions by claiming a 'corporate decision' has been made."
The EIS said the Scottish Borders Council grievance asks for a phased return of pupils and said that the council has responded by acknowledging the union's concerns but not acknowledging the grievance.
The union said it will be pursuing the matter.
READ MORE: Shielding parents ‘extremely scared’ as children return to school
Scottish Borders Council, which is controlled by a Conservative and Independent coalition, has been contacted for comment.
A spokesperson for Moray Council, which is run by a minority SNP administration, said: "We discussed return to school guidance with trade unions throughout the school summer holidays and published this guidance following seven virtual consultations with head teachers prior to the start of term.
"There are arrangements in place across our schools to help pupils and staff phase back to normal in the first few days, including staggered starts and soft introductions to the curriculum, particularly for those in transition years of P1 and S1."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel