WE represent a diverse group of individuals and organisations concerned about the impact on freedom of expression of the proposed Hate Crime and Public Order Bill as currently drafted.
We welcome the provisions to consolidate existing aggravated hate crimes and the repeal of the blasphemy law.
However, the bill creates stirring-up offences without any intent being examined; merely that the words, action, or artwork might do so.
This offence could even be applied to being in possession of materials produced by someone else, where sharing the material could stir up hatred.
READ MORE: Yes writers and artists hit out over Hate Crime Bill
The unintended consequences of this well-meaning bill risk stifling freedom of expression, and the ability to articulate or criticise religious and other beliefs.
As currently worded, the bill could frustrate rational debate and discussion which has a fundamental role in society, including in artistic endeavour. The arts play a key part in shaping Scotland’s identity in addition to being a significant economic contributor.
The right to critique ideas, philosophical, religious and other, must be protected to allow an artistic and democratic society to flourish.
Fraser Sutherland, chief executive, Humanist Society Scotland;
Andrew Copson, chief executive, Humanists UK;
Scottish PEN;
Index on Censorship;
Chris Brookmyre, novelist;
Val McDermid, writer;
Elaine C Smith, actor and comedian;
Dame Seona Reid, arts administrator;
Alan Bissett, playwright and novelist;
Ruth Wishart, journalist and broadcaster;
Andrew Panton, artistic director, Dundee Rep/joint CEO, Dundee Rep & Scottish Dance Theatre Ltd;
Prof Maggie Kinloch, theatre director and chair, Humanist Society Scotland;
Ariane Sherine, comedian and journalist;
Joan Smith, journalist, novelist, and human rights activist;
Peter Tatchell, director, Peter Tatchell Foundation;
Rowan Atkinson, comedian;
Prof A C Grayling, philosopher and author;
Prof Timothy Garton Ash, historian and author of Free Speech;
Nick Ross, television and radio presenter;
Terry Anderson, executive director, Cartoonists Rights Network International;
Gary McLelland, chief executive, Humanists International;
Michael Connarty, former MP and former chair of Parliamentary Humanist Group;
Dr Evan Harris, former MP and former vice-chair of Parliamentary Humanist Group;
Quilliam Foundation
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel