JOHN Swinney has said he is "determined" to address the fierce criticism of the way Scottish pupils' exams were graded.
The Education Secretary will set out a series of steps on Tuesday to tackle the issue which saw pupils’ grades being based on the judgments of their teachers instead of exams which were cancelled due to the pandemic.
However, all of those predicted marks had to be vetted by the SQA’s national system of “moderation”.
The body said this process – the detail of which was kept under wraps until results came out on August 4 – was put in place to maintain “standards and credibility”.
Controversially, the exams body did this in part by looking at each school’s previous history of results.
READ MORE: Fury at SQA as most-deprived pupils’ exam results downgraded
Traditionally, schools in deprived areas have fared worse at exams than their more affluent counterparts.
Overall, around 133,000 entries were adjusted from the initial estimate, around a quarter of all entries – 6.9% of those estimates were adjusted up and 93.1% were adjusted down, with 96% of all adjusted grades changed by one grade.
Swinney has said pass rates rose at every level and would have been the highest on record without the downgrading.
But hundreds of pupils took to Glasgow’s George Square on Friday morning to protest this year’s system and Scottish Labour have called for the Education Secretary to resign.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour call for John Swinney to resign over exam results
Ahead of the return of schools and Parliament, Swinney said: “I have heard the anger of students who feel their hard work has been taken away from them and I am determined to address it.
“These are unprecedented times and as we have said throughout this pandemic, we will not get everything right first time. Every student deserves a grade that reflects the work they have done, and that is what I want to achieve.
“I have been engaged in detailed discussions over the way forward and I know that we need to act and act quickly to give certainty to our young people.
“I will set out on Tuesday how we intend to achieve that.”
Swinney and Nicola Sturgeon have defended the system, stressing that the appeals process would allow eligible pupils to challenge their results if they were downgraded from teachers’ estimates.
The First Minister said the controversial process was “effectively statistical moderation” and argued results would not have been “credible” if the pass rate of the most-deprived pupils had risen by the 19.8% estimated by teachers before moderation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel