DOUGLAS Ross has said he wants indyref2 to be a "non-issue" at the 2021 Holyrood elections.
Despite a Daily Mail article by the new Tory leader and Ruth Davidson saying they are are "united in purpose" in defeating the SNP, Ross said he would rather the future of the Union was not the focus of the vote.
He also denied his record as a UK minister in the Scotland Office until May would be a "milestone” when tackling the SNP Government over its record tackling coronavirus.
READ MORE: Is this Daily Mail article more proof Douglas Ross is a front for Ruth Davidson?
After December’s General Election, Nicola Sturgeon asked Boris Johnson to give Holyrood the power to hold Indyref2, saying she had a clear mandate from the electorate.
The Prime Minister refused in January, claiming Sturgeon and Alex Salmond made a “personal promise” that the 2014 referendum was a once in a generation vote.
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Claim SNP vowed indyref was 'once in a lifetime' opportunity
Johnson said: "The UK Government will continue to uphold the democratic decision of the Scottish people and the promise that you made to them. For that reason, I cannot agree to any request for a transfer of power that would lead to further independence referendums.
"Another independence referendum would continue the political stagnation that Scotland has seen for the last decade, with Scottish schools, hospitals and jobs again left behind because of a campaign to separate the UK.”
But with polls indicating an SNP majority in next May’s Holyrood election, there is growing speculation Johnson may allow indyref2 if voters back Sturgeon’s position.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross ‘rewriting history’ with indyref2 claim
Asked today whether Johnson’s refusal made Indyref2 a moot point in the election, thereby denying the Scottish Tories one of their traditional battle cries, Ross said: “The Prime Minister has been very clear in his position on another divisive independence referendum six years on from our once in a generation vote.
“I really hope it is a non-issue next May because that means politics has moved on from the constitutional division that has dominated our political debate in the last six years.
“That has suited the SNP because they don’t have to defend their record on failing services.
“What we’ve seen from young people demonstrating in Glasgow today, they want to see their politicians focusing on education and on their future, and that’s what I’m looking to do as leader of the Scottish Conservatives.”
Asked whether Johnson’s refusal meant Unionists could back the SNP next year knowing the UK was safe, Ross said the SNP would still try to use every vote to justify independence and continue constitutional division.
He said: “Sadly, the SNP will use every opportunity to divide our country and separate Scotland from the rest of the UK, the most successful economic and political union the world has seen, and they will use next May’s election for their ultimate aim as well.
“What I want to make loud and clear is the strongest pro-Union party on the ballot next year will be the Scottish Conservatives that I lead.
“But I also want use to focus not just on that constitutional argument, but positive cases for remaining part of the Union, and a positive vision for using our devolved powers in Scotland to improve the lives of people the length and breadth of the country.”
Ross, who became leader unopposed on Wednesday, also denied that his time as a UK minister at the start of the pandemic would haunt him when his party challenged the SNP Government’s record on Covid.
He said: “Do I think my role within the UK Government is a millstone around my neck during this pandemic? No, I don’t. I think what people expect is the UK and Scottish Governments to work together, which they did successfully at the early stage of this pandemic.
“I will be constructive if I think the Scottish Government have taken the right approach but I will also scrutinise any errors that have been made to ensure the are not repeated.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel