TWITTER is to stop “amplifying” tweets from state-controlled accounts, it has announced.
It means tweets from those profiles are less likely to show up on timelines, notifications and search results.
As part of the revamp, labels will be added to the profiles of government officials and state-affiliated media groups to provide more context on who the account represents.
The new feature will initially focus on senior political officials who are the voice of their state abroad and accounts belonging to state-backed media, its editors and senior staff.
Labelled state-affiliated media accounts and their tweets will not be amplified through Twitter's various recommendation features.
Personal accounts of heads of state will not be labelled. Neither will state-financed media organisations with editorial independence, such as the BBC or NPR in the US.
READ MORE: Tories make complaint over posts liked by Scottish Government Twitter
The social media platform said that for political figures, the labels would currently only be applied to accounts from the countries that make up the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – China, France, Russia, the UK and the US.
The company said it was an "important step" which would help users when they see an account discussing geopolitical issues "have context on its national affiliation and are better informed about who they represent".
On media organisations, Twitter said: "State-affiliated media is defined as outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.
"Unlike independent media, state-affiliated media frequently use their news coverage as a means to advance a political agenda. We believe that people have the right to know when a media account is affiliated directly or indirectly with a state actor."
The platform has been one of the most active in taking action against political figures and groups – in 2019 it banned state-backed media advertising and all political advertising – and has recently taken action against tweets from US President Donald Trump for breaching site rules.
Any account given a label under the new programme will be notified and the account owner will be entitled to an appeal, Twitter confirmed.
The company said the labelling scheme is likely to be expanded further over time to cover accounts from a wider range of countries.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel