PUB owners should be legally required to log customer details to help halt the spread of Covid and keep businesses open, licensed trade officials have suggested.
Paul Waterson, official spokesman for the Scottish Licensed Trade Association (SLTA) said the Test and Protect guideline could become mandatory and said owners should also consider refusing to serve people who fail to comply with data sharing.
The First Minister has suggested pubs could be forced to close if businesses flout guidelines including social distancing restrictions, saying pictures of weekend crowds, “made her want to cry.”
Waterson said he shared Nicola Sturgeon’s concerns and said the licensed trade was now in a “fragile situation.”
Anecdotal evidence suggests compliance with data collection is patchy in pubs, which should provide written forms for customers to complete personal details or scannable QR codes on tables.
One Glasgow pub-goer said: “The crowds I saw pouring out an (East End) pub on Saturday nearly made me cry. Definitely no track and trace being reordered with those numbers. Even the one empty pub I’ve been to didn’t take details. The pubs will be the failure.”
Another said of a City Centre bar: “They had slips at the front to fill in but the staff weren’t pointing them out and I saw hardly anyone filling them in.”
Paul Waterson, who also owns a pub in Stirling, said: “We have no evidence of that but I’m not saying it’s not happening.
“It’s very important that the authorities clamp down on people who aren’t adhering to the guidance and regulations in any sense.
“It’s not mandatory to do it but perhaps it should be mandatory. Pubs are bound by regulations, you have to ask someone their age when they come in for example and this is another one.
“If pubs aren’t doing it then it’s up to the government to look at it.
“Do you serve someone who refuses to give their details? That’s up to the individual operator to decide but it’s really vital, especially as we see the situation developing in other countries that the test and trace is viable and for it to be viable we need to take this action.”
“You have got to rely on the pub owners being responsible but you’ve also got to rely on the customers filling out the forms properly.
Waterson said he shared the First Minister’s concern about images shared of pubs apparently flouting social distancing requirements but added: “As far as I can see the crowding in the photographs I saw were all outside of pubs.
“It’s very difficult to control what’s happening outside the pubs on pavements. It might not be your customers, it might be people who don’t listen to what you are telling them.
“We would agree with the First Minister that this is a very fragile situation. We are vulnerable at the moment.
“It would be very easy for more spikes to come and for businesses to be shut down again which is something that would be disastrous for everybody.
Andy Fairgrieve, manager of the Hootenany pub in Glasgow said the bar is taking written details from customers and said staff had not experienced any resistance.
He said: "Obviously it gets more difficult if the pub is busy but everyone is keen to do it. "We've not had a single complaint."
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: "Our team routinely contacts businesses viewed at a higher risk of non-compliance and also has the power to close down premises which they consider to be operating unsafely."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “Establishments such as restaurants and pubs where there may be an increased risk of transmission, are required to gather minimum contact details for all customers, visitors and staff.
“This is to support Test and Protect in the event an outbreak or cluster of cases being tracked back to the premises.
“The gathering of data to support Test and Protect is not yet mandated in law – it is currently something we strongly encourage all businesses to do - but we will not hesitate to legislate if necessary.
“Businesses which fail to follow the guidance are putting the continued opening of hospitality at risk. People should report concerns relating to their local Environmental Health service which will give advice and can investigate when appropriate.
“We would also urge members of the public to avoid premises which are failing to follow the relevant guidance to provide a safe environment for patrons.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel