THE SNP have said Douglas Ross has is "Boris Johnson's man in Scotland" after his claims that there will be no second independence referendum as Nicola Sturgeon had signed an “agreement with the UK and Scottish governments that it would be once in a generation”.
The MP – who looks certain to become the next leader of the Scottish Tories this week – also claimed the House of Lords was more democratic than Holyrood.
In an interview with BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland, Ross said: “Nicola Sturgeon has confirmed that [sustained support] has happened when the SNP has not been speaking about separation.
“I don’t want us to focus on the debate we had just six years ago. I want us to focus on the next five years of this parliament.
“I think the majority of Scots want better education for their children and grandchildren, and a health service that is not under investigation . . . good jobs that are well paid and a strong economy.
“Nicola Sturgeon did sign that agreement with the UK and Scottish governments that it would be once in a generation.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross: Who is the Tory MP rumoured to replace Jackson Carlaw?
The SNP said Ross is “trying to rewrite history”, with depute leader Keith Brown saying: “The Scottish Tories under Douglas Ross and Baroness Davidson are same as they ever were.
"And they’ve been caught trying to rewrite history, again. Fact is Douglas Ross is nothing more than Boris Johnson’s man in Scotland – and clearly no-one can trust a word he says.”
READ MORE: Here's what Scottish Tory leader hopeful Douglas Ross said he'd do if PM
Sturgeon was a signatory to the Edinburgh Agreement, which transferred power from Westminster to Holyrood to ensure the 2014 independence referendum was legally binding and would deliver “a result that everyone will respect”.
It did not preclude or set a time limit on further independence referendums.
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Claim SNP vowed indyref was 'once in a lifetime' opportunity
Ross added: “I can be a strong independent voice.
“I think people have seen that in my actions, both in my resignation from the Scotland Office and what I have done throughout my career as an MP, MSP and a councillor.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel