THERE were two pivotal features in last weekend’s excellent Sunday National – Gerry Hassan’s “Independence The New Normal” and Ben Jackson’s “The New Muscular British Nationalism – Brawn Not Brain”.
I suggest both should be read in detail by all those preparing the strategy for the next independence referendum.
The stakes are now very serious, with the response from “muscular British nationalism”, as outlined by Jackson, being to metaphorically flatten Scottish nationalism.
Both features have a common thread and that is the need, if we are to convert a critical mass of the current 46% of No and Not-sure voters to Yes, for a well-articulated new “vision for independence”.
What will it look like? How will it be different from today? Is it worth the effort to change?
That vision needs to be inspiring, robust and meaningful for the majority.
It needs to be based on our shared progressive values of fairness, equality of opportunity, honesty and dignity for all.
Sadly, the articulation of that vision is not strong in the Growth Commission Report which, with all due respect to Andrew Wilson and his team, is but a continuation of the “me too” of the UK economy but on a smaller scale.
It is for our party leadership to define and articulate this vision.
They must front it as if written by themselves, and not by a delegated “expert” group.
As a party, it is their responsibility to ensure that we must never be tripped up again on the fundamentals.
Questions of which currency will we use and do we have a central bank – the answer to both must surely be yes, we will have both our own currency and central bank, and from day one.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: With more Holyrood powers 'fewer Scots would have died'
The comment at the time in 2014 that “the pound is our currency too” just didn’t cut it and was a critical reason for failure.
The reasons for voting No last time, as defined in the article by Hassan, must all be addressed in detail and robust responses developed as part of that new vision.
The party leadership need to do this now, not after the 2021 Scottish Parliamentary elections, irrespective of the results.
We already know that Boris Johnson’s response to a landslide victory, itself not at all assured, will be “no”, never mind “now is not the time”.
I am hoping that the creation of that new vision is already well developed, if not completed. Either way, it is time it was articulated to the Scottish electorate and advanced in all conversations with the media.
The party has an abundance of MPs at Westminster who should be well capable and on the case.
Let’s not kid ourselves, worse still be naive – the task ahead is daunting.
The UK state will stop at nothing to thwart the cause of independence.
You can easily see why – the loss of international prestige to England and her establishment caused by Scotland achieving independence would be deeply felt and catastrophic to their self-belief.
Internationally, that loss of prestige would manifest itself, in a practical sense, in the likely loss of the UK seat and veto on the Security Council of the United Nations, the removal of Trident from Scotland to who knows where, their loss of global military status and, of course, the loss of vast energy resources – much of which remain untapped – and associated revenues.
Moreover, the food resources from Scotland are critical to a Brexit Britain as it will be without food security.
All these are the stakes at play in England.
Here in Scotland we have one more chance, based on the democratic deficit, not having voted for Brexit nor a Tory Government since 1955.
We need our leadership to move the proposition, articulate that new vision of what excactly an independent Scotland looks like – and what it means for all those yet to be convinced.
Ian Stewart
Uig
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel