A LONG-SERVING SNP MSP is to step down after working in the Scottish Parliament for more than 20 years.
Gil Paterson (below) was elected as an MSP for Central Scotland in 1999, before becoming a West of Scotland MSP in 2007 and later the MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie in 2011.
In a statement released this afternoon the MSP said it had been an “honour and privilege” to represent his constituency for nine years.
He said stepping down had been a “difficult decision” to make. However, he added his “own personal situation” had told him 2021 is the “right time” to stand down from the role.
Paterson said: “It has been truly an honour and privilege to represent the Clydebank and Milngavie Constituency, not forgetting the communities of Bearsden North and Old Kilpatrick, who unfortunately are not mentioned in the constituency official title.
“It has been a difficult decision for me to make, however, my own personal situation tells me that the 2021 election is the right time for me to stand down”.
“I have met some truly wonderful and inspiring people, both individually and through our outstanding local organisations and community groups during my time as the MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, and I thank each of them for their support.
“Although I won’t be returning after the next election, there are still ten months of this Parliament to go and much water to run under the bridge before then, so I can assure everyone that I remain absolutely committed to working hard as your MSP for the rest of this Parliament and will continue to do my utmost for my constituents that deserve and expect nothing less of me.”
Paterson joined the SNP in 1967 and has held many positions at all levels of the party, from branch to National Executive Council.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel