BP has been fined £7000 after admitting an unpermitted discharge of crude oil in the North Sea. About 95 tonnes of oil was released into the sea 75 miles west of Shetland on October 2, 2016.
An investigation by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy found a process failure resulted in the “significant amount” of oil leaking.
The company had intended to start production from a newly drilled well on the Clair Phase 1 offshore installation. As it was not a routine operation, a specific written procedure was prepared by BP.
Regular water sampling should have been in place with results fed back to the control room, the investigation found, and written procedure was not specific on when results should be provided or when control should request late results. As a result the crude oil was discharged into the North Sea.
At Aberdeen Sheriff Court yesterday, BP Exploration Operating Company Limited pleaded guilty to a contravention of Regulation 3(1) of the Offshore Petroleum Activities (Oil Pollution Prevention and Control) Regulations 2005.
Alistair Duncan, head of the Crown Office health and safety investigation unit, said: “BP accepted liability and the Crown accepted its guilty plea.
READ MORE: ‘Oil industry must prepare to feel the pinch of crisis’
“The lack of sufficiently robust procedures could have had a significant environmental impact had these issues not been addressed.
“Thankfully there was no significant impact to the environment as a result of this incident and the company has introduced improved procedures since then. Hopefully this prosecution will serve as a reminder that failing to have sufficiently robust procedures and adhere to the regulations can have potentially serious consequences.”
BP said it carried out a thorough investigation. A spokesman said: “Safety is BP’s core value and our operations are grounded in the principles of no accidents, no harm to people and no damage to the environment. On this occasion, we regrettably fell short of these high standards.
“While there was no injury to people or significant impact on the environment, this incident should not have happened.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel