IT came as no surprise that the Unionist media adopted a positive slant on Prime Minister Johnson’s recent brief and somewhat pointless visit to Scotland (“How the Unionist media reacted to Johnson’s visit” – The National, July 25).
It is an unfortunate but accurate fact that the majority of British national newspapers, and I include Scotland in this, consistently adopt an obsequious stance towards the Westminster Government and seldom attempt to scrutinise its disjointed policy implementation, ignoring their glaring obfuscation and increasingly desperate evasive and dishonest narrative.
The majority of our daily national newspapers are unapologetically right-wing and owned by billionaires such as the Barclay brothers, Rupert Murdoch and Viscount Rothermere. Their raison d’etre is to protect and defend the Conservative Government, and therefore the status quo, regardless of fairness or social justice.
Rather than hold the present government to account, they wilfully misreport policy failings and run banner headlines deifying the Prime Minister to appeal to the unquestioning reader, a naked and unashamed bread and circuses approach to journalism.
Many of these publications neither enhance nor encourage democratic thought or debate and make no effort to be objective or politically balanced. The headlines proclaiming Johnson’s foray into selected and safeguarded Tory-friendly places to be a raging success are not only deceptive and disingenuous but desperate.
We can expect an onslaught of blatant and cheap attempts to smear the independence movement in the days and months ahead as the polls widen and the impact of Brexit begins to hit home. The full weight of the UK established media will stand firmly behind the Union as their very existence is under threat. The gloves are well and truly off.
The National stands as a beacon of hope for those in Scotland who reject publications that exist to defend the UK state or to act as cheerleaders for the UK Government. It is clearly and unapologetically in favour of Scottish independence but also inclusive, introspective and progressive. I look forward to the day in Scotland when a free press reports the news to a free people.
Owen Kelly
Stirling
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel