THE Brussels and UK chief negotiators have aired mixed messages over the likelihood of a post-Brexit trade deal, following the conclusion of their latest round of talks.
The European Union’s Michel Barnier said a deal looked “unlikely” and that the two sides remained at a stalemate.
Meanwhile David Frost, representing the UK, confirmed there was a continued impasse but struck a more hopeful tone in his media appearance.
He said an “agreement can still be reached in September” but called for the EU to recognise it was in discussions with an “independent state”.
Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Barnier warned the “time for answers is quickly running out”.
“By its current refusal to commit to the condition of open and fair competition, and to a balanced agreement on fisheries, the UK makes a trade agreement at this point unlikely,” he said.
But a senior UK Government source involved in the negotiations, when asked about Barnier’s comments, said they were a “truism” given the current situation but argued “things can move forward”.
The UK’s transition period for leaving the EU is due to lapse at the end of December. Both sides have said any trade deal needs to be concluded by October in order to be ratified.
Frost told broadcasters that “considerable gaps remain in the most difficult areas”.
But, he added: “Despite all the difficulties, on the basis of the work we have done in July, my assessment is that agreement can still be reached in September and that we should continue to negotiate with this aim in mind.”
The former Foreign Office official warned, however, that without movement on the most significant issues, a No-Deal scenario remained an option.
He said: “We have made progress in areas like trade, trade of goods and services, transport, social security cooperation, EU programmes, participation and so on – which is good.
“But nevertheless big differences do remain, in particular with the familiar questions of the ... so-called level playing field and fisheries policy.
“We’re in a negotiation. Either outcome is possible. We will work energetically to get a deal but it is possible we won’t reach one.”
READ MORE: These are the Brexit key sticking points after 'intensified talks' in London
Barnier told reporters the UK’s position on fisheries was “simply unacceptable”.
“The UK is effectively seeking for near-total exclusion of fishing vessels from the UK’s water,” he said.
But a senior UK Government source said while the UK would have the “right to control the economic exploitation” of its fishing grounds after the transition period, talk of exclusion was incorrect.
The source continued: “That doesn’t necessarily require the exclusion of EU trawlers from our waters.
“What it means is an agreed abatement in which we have the right to control access to that zone – and that is what at the moment they find difficult to accept.
“Until they do, it is going to be difficult to get to a fisheries agreement.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel