THE UK Government’s coronavirus messaging caused "unnecessary confusion" in devolved countries, MPs have concluded.
The Scottish Affairs Committee has criticised Boris Johnson’s administration for broadcasting health messages which only applied to England across the whole of the UK.
In its interim report on intergovernmental working during the pandemic, the committee called on Downing Street to outline how it plans to address what it described as its "failings in messaging".
On May 10, the UK Government announced a shift from telling people to "stay at home" to advising they "stay alert". The message was then broadcast UK-wide, despite no changes in the devolved administrations.
Scottish Secretary Alister Jack told the committee First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was aware of an impending change but was not told what change would be made.
The report said: "The UK Government has failed to make clear when its messaging applies only to England, causing unnecessary confusion in the devolved nations.
"There should be messaging clarity to minimise confusion across national boundaries, and this must begin to happen with immediate effect.
"Then, in its response to the committee, the Government must outline how it intends to address its failings in messaging and how it plans to distribute future messages."
Messaging should make clear which parts of the UK it is aimed at from the outset, the report said.
It added: "Post-message clarification is too late a point for providing these explanations since it risks leaving members of the public without the information they need to determine which messages apply to them when they need it."
The report, published today, also said divergence between the devolved administrations and the UK Government happened "sometimes accidentally".
Scottish Affairs Committee chairman Pete Wishart also voiced concerns about the "pre-existing, creaking mechanisms at the heart of intergovernmental relations".
READ MORE: UK minister takes credit for Scotland's Covid-19 outcome
The SNP MP added there is seen to be a "void" in intergovernmental communications after Ministerial Implementation Groups (MIGs) – panels set up to allow for contact between the governments in key areas – were stopped.
He said: "As the focus has shifted from containment to opening up the economy, we are concerned that the structures that made this possible have stopped.
"We heard that there is a 'void' in ministerial-level communication and which appears to have occurred around the time that some divergence and confusion in messaging began to emerge.
"Simple mistakes of not making clear which nations in which new policies apply must not be made again.
"Meanwhile, the lack of clarity over what role, if any, Scottish and devolved decision-makers will play in new structures is a source of major concern."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel