ROYAL Bank of Scotland bosses hailed a “historic” milestone ahead of it formally changing its name to NatWest Group today, in a shift away from the brand that was bailed out during the financial crisis.
The name change will be official once it is registered at Companies House in Edinburgh, where the group has its headquarters.
New chief executive Alison Rose unveiled the change in February as part of her new strategy soon after taking on the top job last autumn.
It sees the lending giant move away from a brand that was tarnished by its mammoth £45.5 billion state bailout in 2008.
Bank branches will continue to trade as RBS and the name will still be heavily associated with the business.
But investors and advisers will now know the listed entity as NatWest Group – changing a name that has been in place since the bank’s foundation in 1727.
Rose said: “This is a historic day for our bank as we intend to change our name to NatWest Group plc.
“Although there will be no changes to our customer brands, it’s a symbolic moment for our colleagues and stakeholders. The bank has changed fundamentally over the last decade and now is the right time to align our group name with the brand under which the majority of our business is delivered.”
The group – which is still majority-owned by the taxpayer more than a decade since the financial crisis – became one of the biggest banks in the world through an aggressive acquisition trail.
But this unravelled during the crash when it was forced to turn to the Government for bailout cash to avoid collapse and it has since shed much of its international operation and once-mighty investment banking arm.
The group has also been embroiled in a scandal over its treatment of small businesses through its controversial global restructuring group.
The lender also announced that climate change expert Lord Nicholas Stern has been appointed as an independent adviser to NatWest Group.
Stern currently chairs the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and is chairman of London School of Economics’s Grantham Research Institute.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here