A POLITICAL science expert has confirmed that British nationalism is "behind much of Unionism".
Alisa Henderson, who is a political science professor at Edinburgh University, was responding to an article in The Herald that argued Scotland needs alternative names for "nationalist" and "Unionist."
The article said: "The word 'nationalist' correctly describes some of the independence movement and the word 'Unionist' does the same for people who want to stay in the UK. The terms are accurate to an extent – just not accurate enough."
"The continuing use of the terms unionist and nationalist could contribute to increasing hysteria and prevent people on all sides coming to terms with whatever political changes are in our future," it added.
Henderson tweeted: "2 dimensions at play (but I would say that):
"Preferred state structure (federal - asymmetrical or not- devolution, unitary)
"View of demos/peoples (mono vs plurinational)
"The long running problem with 'nats vs unionists' is that it ignores Brit nat'm behind much of unionism."
2 dimensions at play (but I would say that):
— Ailsa Henderson (@ailsa_henderson) July 20, 2020
Preferred state structure (federal - asymmetrical or not- devolution, unitary)
View of demos/peoples (mono vs plurinational)
The long running problem with 'nats vs unionists' is that it ignores Brit nat'm behind much of unionism.
The article also acknowledged that Nicola Sturgeon said in 2017 that she wouldn't choose Scottish National Party as a name if she could turn back time as she knows it is "reductive and negative".
It concluded: "Ordinary words have become enemies, and weapons, and yet here we are, still using them because we don’t have much choice. We need something else. We need alternatives. Suggestions, please."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel