GLOBAL wildlife monitoring needs to be stepped up to reduce the risk of future pandemics, experts have warned.
Scientists from the Wildlife Disease Surveillance Focus Group want improvements in the testing and tracking of organisms that cause disease, known as pathogens, in wildlife to help avoid another worldwide outbreak.
The University of Edinburgh is part of the focus group.
Previous outbreaks of new diseases such as Sars and Mers were caused by the crossover of pathogens from animals to humans.
Sars coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for Covid-19, is thought to have originated in bats and moved into other wildlife hosts before crossing over into humans.
A lack of knowledge about how the step between animals and humans happened highlights the need for improved surveillance, the group said.
To avoid a repeat of Covid-19, wildlife must be tested closer to areas of risk, better use should be made of technology, and greater oversight introduced for the international wildlife trade, the group said in an article published in the journal Science.
Currently, there is no wildlife trade pathogen screening, including for animals or their products that are eaten, transported or hunted as game.
The group said this lack of oversight is concerning, pointing out that some 89% of known RNA viruses – the class of SARS-CoV-2, Mers coronavirus and Ebola belong to – that have the potential to cause harm to humans could cross over from animals.
It outlines recommendations including an increase in laboratory testing capacity at or near locations where humans and wildlife interact.
Europe and North America are home to 62% of laboratories screening for animal pathogens, while the areas seen to be at most risk of emerging infectious diseases, such as Asia and Africa, account for 26% and 3% respectively.
Boosting testing technology by using small, cost-effective devices such as portable DNA sequencers in local testing centres – currently being trialled by the University of Edinburgh – could help address the issue, experts said. The focus group also recommends creating a central public database to record animal virus characteristics to assist in monitoring the risk of crossover to humans.
It would enable any scientist to see how pathogens are evolving, how common they are worldwide and identify early potential targets mitigation measures, including antiviral treatments or vaccines.
A further recommendation is to introduce international standards for the wildlife trade, particularly around screening for products which are transported.
The University of Edinburgh’s Zoological and Conservation Medicine chairwoman, Professor Anna Meredith, said: “We know that many diseases like Covid-19 can cross from animals to humans but we don’t focus enough on the animal side of the human-animal equation.
“Locally-driven surveillance and responses will empower local wildlife and public health professionals to constantly monitor for pathogens at source and improve the likelihood of prevention or early mitigation of future crossover events.”
Wildlife experts from Melbourne University, Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, and at San Diego Zoo are also part of the focus group.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel