GEORGE Kerevan was right to suggest “Johnson is lying when he says no austerity over the decade to come” (June 29). Mr Kerevan correctly points out that increased borrowing to get the shovel-ready projects Mr Johnson is promising up and running to create jobs will see increased debt, which needs paid back by the taxpayer through increased taxation – there is no other way.
So the PM is deluding himself in saying there will be no return to austerity. The public is fully aware of the economic crisis the country is now facing, with massive long-term job losses. Many households who are fortunate enough to hold on to their jobs will incur increases to their utility bills, local government services and taxation and those who are unfortunate and lose their employment will be forced on to benefits.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson is lying when he says there's no austerity in the next decade
The Government in Scotland knows the economy and needs of the Scottish people better than anyone or anywhere else. What a pity that in our hour of economic need, in such a critical time, Scotland does not have full control of her own economy.
Catriona C Clark
Banknock
AS always, I enjoyed Kevin McKenna’s piece in Wednesday’s National (Under Johnson’s Tory cult, Britain is a country that faces a crumbling future, July 1). After reading it, you can say that pulling the strings of the incompetent rabble which constitutes the UK Government we have in one corner Dominic the Rose-garden Rasputin and in the other, the Lyin’ King!
Alan Woodcock
Dundee
THE World Health Organisation report advising that minimum unit pricing on alcohol is working better than taxation to reduce alcohol consumption should be applauded. This is a “Scotland good news” story, and it is not often that we get a mention on the world stage.
Despite the six years of argument and legal challenges by vested interests, its implementation in 2018 is making a change in the alcohol consumption levels in the most “at-risk” groups, the change actually being a support action for this group.
This is what we should expect from our Government – transformational change for the benefit of our society – but often it is hard graft changing attitudes which are less than flexible due to their embedded historic and financial position.
There will be others who will continually “throw stones” at our Government projects and highlight failure, so it seems fair that when an external “job well done” is received we should acknowledge it.
So well done all who stuck with this to get this legislation through.
Alistair Ballantyne
Birkhill, Angus
IF anything, Covid-19 has highlighted the many differences between Scotland and England, something often dismissed and discounted, particularly by those who think Scotland would be none the better for independent self-government.
The pandemic has been showing contrasting responses in the two countries, to lockdown for instance, with Scotland exhibiting more patience – though a considerably greater population in England with its higher density living conditions could explain this.
The two governments are also seen to have handled the crisis differently, with Scotland being more explicit and less erratic and this reflecting the general citizenry of both countries. Despite which many individuals are un-bordered in their opinions and are individuals regardless of country.
Many in England do not regard the antics of PM Boris Johnson with the amused tolerance of “that’s just Boris for you!” and there are a few in Scotland who regard FM Nicola Sturgeon as too risk-averse.
Being an individual, and Scottish, and unashamed of holding what I hope are open-minded opinions, I am happy enough to say that if all of this happened to be my report of an international football match between the two countries, I would be reporting a decisive win for Scotland, something like 4-1 or 4-0.
I would also be adding that the England manager, Johnson, had been unceremoniously sacked and an audience with the monarch to notify the position was unnecessary. Ach well, anything to lighten the gloom
of lockdown ...
Ian Johnstone
Peterhead
I DON’T quite understand why getting the most out of the voting system for the Scottish Parliament is thought of as gaming or a ruse.
It is perfectly legitimate for any registered political party to enter the contest for seats as MSPs in the Scottish Parliament.
The Alliance for Independence is expected to launch some time in the next few weeks with the intention of contesting only list seats – a perfectly good way of making an impact.
Having only one prominent independence party in Scotland is not healthy. Looking forward to getting some fresh air and vitality when the Alliance for Independence starts working.
Chris Saga
Isle of Bute
AFTER the outrage from Jackson Carlaw over Nicola’s fetching tartan mask,I suggest that “Fluffy£ Mundell on his next shopping expedition should wear a Union Jack mask, and of course Alister (Union) Jack and the rest of
the Scottish Tories. Some of the Border farmers who voted for this dross should maybe replace their union masks with tartan.
John Taylor
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel