“CRUEL and degrading” benefit sanctions are to be reintroduced across the UK from tomorrow (Tuesday, June 30) despite calls from the opposition to extend the suspension period.
Speaking in the House of Commons today, Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey said: “It’s important that as the jobcentres fully re-open this week, we do reinstate the need for having a claimant commitment.”
Face-to-face meetings between those on jobseekers allowance and jobcentre officers were suspended in March due to the pandemic.
The benefit sanctions, financial penalties which see people deprived of four weeks of benefits or more for failing to spend enough time job hunting or missing an interview, were suspended at the same time.
READ MORE: Coronavirus leaves 1.4 million without access to public funds, study finds
Earlier this month Evan Williams, a research associate at the University of Glasgow, wrote that such sanctions had in the past paid “scant regard to the actual availability of jobs in the economy”, adding that they are “unlikely to be effective in lowering unemployment in the current context”.
His paper on benefit sanctions, published in the journal Social Policy Administration, concluded that the Tories’ use of such penalties negatively impacted on people’s anxieties and depression.
The “current sanctions policy can be considered to be ‘cruel, inhumane and degrading’,” he wrote.
READ MORE: DWP: Fears surge in applicants could delay Scots welfare roll-out
Labour has called the reintroduction of the sanctions “untenable” given the current economic situation, with unemployment rising, vacancies plummeting, and large numbers of the population still shielding from the virus.
Coffey said: “It’s an essential part of the contract to help people start to reconsider what vacancies there may be.
“But I know I can trust the work coaches, my jobcentre managers who are empowered to act proactively … there will be some people right now who’ve never had to look for a job in the last 20 to 30 years.
“They will need careful support tailored to ensure they can start to look for the jobs that are available, and that I hope will become very soon available.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel