HEALTH Secretary Jeane Freeman has said she is confident rape and sexual assault victims will be able to choose the gender of their forensic medical examiner under new legislation.
Freeman told Holyrood’s Health Committee people will be able to self-refer and should not have to wait more than three hours for an examination. At a previous evidence session on the proposed Forensic Medical Services (Victims of Sexual Offences) (Scotland) Bill, Rape Crisis Scotland chief executive Sandy Brindley said access to a female doctor “is the most important issue brought up by complainers”.
She added delays in waiting for an examination is also a key issue.
Freeman told the committee she has “confidence” victims will be able to choose to be examined by a man or woman under the proposals. She said: “I agree completely that people should have that choice, I think it is very important, particularly in those circumstances.
“There are clearly some levels of a restriction to an extent in that, where we have a team of sexual offence examiners that is predominantly male, those individuals will be on contracts and so you have to find other ways to add to the number, so that you can offer that choice.
“But the task force [to improve services for victims of rape and sexual assault] has that work well in hand.”
Under the proposed legislation, victims could self-refer to have an examination that would collect forensic evidence without them having to contact police. Any evidence would be securely stored, allowing victims to decide whether to lodge a police report in their own time. They could also have health concerns addressed, such as requirements for psychological support and emergency contraception.
Freeman said victims who come forward should be seen within three hours, as recommended by Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Although she suggested there may be issues meeting that target in remote and island areas, she added: “I am confident in our commitment to try to ensure that we can ensure coverage of the whole of Scotland, notwithstanding that our challenges that we need to find ways through.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel