MSPS have told Scotland’s football authorities that progress on improving rights for young players has been too slow and external regulation may be needed.
A Scottish Parliament committee is concerned about young players being stuck in exploitative contracts which do not pay them fairly.
The issue was first raised in a petition to the Scottish Parliament 10 years ago, but the Public Petitions Committee said changes brought in by the SFA and SPFL have not solved the problem.
The committee wants to ensure under-16s are not required to sign multi-year contracts and that young players receive the minimum wage.
Convener Johann Lamont said: “There is a huge power imbalance between football clubs and the young people who aspire to play for them. Clubs trading in children’s dreams should not be hiding devils in the detail, such as contractual small print which too many young people and their parents or carers may overlook.
“The committee welcomes some of the measures introduced by the SFA, but this progress has been painfully slow. After 10 years, the committee believes that time is up.
“A number of the issues in this petition are not simply about football, but the protection and welfare of our young people.”
A report released today says that regulation or new legislation might be the only way forward.
The committee also said there had appeared to be breaches in the rules around children’s human rights in football, which the Children and Young People’s Commissioner should investigate.
Lamont added: “We are also concerned that the commissioner is not prioritising this petition in his office’s work, despite agreeing with his predecessor that issues remain unresolved. We believe the commissioner’s office still has a critical role to play in ensuring the rights of children involved in youth football are not overlooked.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel