CONSTITUTION Secretary has said the decision to halt planning for a second independence referendum needs to be revisited due to the Brexit process.
Mike Russell railed against these negotiations and a perceived lack of engagement with the devolved nations from the UK Government when he appeared before Holyrood's Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs Committee.
The Scottish Government announced in March it would postpone planning for another independence referendum in 2020, an issue that was key to the SNP election campaign in 2019.
Following the 2019 General Election, the Scottish Government requested the powers to hold a second independence referendum, which was rejected by the Prime Minister.
Russell told MSPs the UK Government has refused to compromise on seeking an extension to the December 31 date for the end of the transition period with the EU in the way the Scottish Government has on Scottish independence.
He added: "The fact that they've refused to do so shows me that the compromise that we have taken in order to ensure that all our resources are focused on Covid-19 is something we will need to revisit."
The Cabinet minister said this is "one of the bigger impacts you can have on the economy" without the risk of the increased spread of coronavirus.
He questioned the timing of the Brexit process, which is expected coincide with a recovery from one of the worst recessions in recorded history due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Russell said: "If you accept that is the case, what type of insanity would then lead you to suppose you could pile on an additional hit to GDP?
"The only reason for doing it would be because ideologically you're fixated by this or because you think you can hide the damage from Brexit under worse damage being done by something else."
Russell also criticised the Joint Ministerial Committee, which brings together officials from the devolved administrations and UK Government to discuss common issues.
A separate sub-committee has been set up specifically for the EU negotiations.
He said a number of ideas were put forward by the devolved countries but "zilch" was offered by the UK Government.
Russell said: "We've brought ideas to the table, we've talked about them, we've published them.
"You have zilch from the UK Government. There is no commitment to change, no matter what is said.
"I believe there is a deep-rooted hostility to devolution and a view of the supremacy of Westminster that I believe can't be changed."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel