THE Scottish Government will look into the effectiveness of empathy training for those who commit crimes against animals as proposed new welfare legislation faces its final vote.
The Animals and Wildlife (Penalties, Protections and Powers) (Scotland) Bill will be voted on at stage three today and will look to strengthen penalties for offences against animals.
Ahead of the debate on the bill, Rural Affairs Minister Mairi Gougeon announced plans to commission a research project into empathy training which could be used as a community sentence for some offences.
The project will soon be put out to tender, with the research due to last for six months.
Gougeon said: “While the Animals and Wildlife Bill, if passed, will empower the courts to consider longer prison sentences for the most serious crimes, which are thankfully rare, it is right that we consider a range of ways to tackle offending in this area.
“Historically, many cases brought in front of the courts have been for neglect or a lack of understanding of how to properly care for animals.
“Providing opportunities to challenge and change attitudes, while ensuring an individual faces up to the impact of their crime, offers another tool in preventing re-offending and further harm to animals.
“We hope that this research will lead to further collaborative development of empathy or restorative approaches and enable them to be made available to the courts as an appropriate part of a community payback order, depending on the circumstances of the case.”
The bill has a total of 64 amendments at stage three, which will be decided on as part of a late sitting in Holyrood today.
Scottish Greens MSP Mark Ruskell tabled amendments to end the docking of dogs’ tails along with curtailing the licensed killing of beavers while his colleague Alison Johnstone will push for more protections for mountain hares – for which a petition garnered 10,000 signatures.
Tory MSP Maurice Golden also proposed an amendment to ban shock collars, which electrocute dogs as a method of training.
Golden’s amendment was backed by animal charities including OneKind, the Scottish SPCA and the Dog’s Trust.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel