A YOUGOV poll on support for independence with “absurd” options will lead to “absurd interpretations”, according to a top public policy professor.
AN SNP staffer shared a screenshot of the survey which does not use the standard question “should Scotland be an independent country”, with the options Yes and No.
Instead the poll asks: “If there were another referendum on Scottish independence, how do you think you would vote?”
The answers provided include: “I would vote ‘Yes’ (leave the UK)”, “I would vote ‘No’ (stay in the UK)”, “would not vote” and “don’t know”.
Look out for some YouGov polling on independence... pic.twitter.com/rQHfdbrMvd
— Lloyd Melville (@LloydAMelville) June 11, 2020
In the next question participants are asked to select a statement they agree with out of the following: “Scotland should become independent, separate from the rest of the UK and the European Union”, “Scotland should become independent, separate from the res of the UK but part of the European Union”, “Scotland should remain part of the UK with its own elected parliament which has some taxation powers”, “Scotland should remain part of the UK with its own elected parliament which has no taxation powers”.
READ MORE: SNP say case for independence 'growing stronger' after new poll
The final question suggests abolishing Holyrood, reading: “Scotland should remain part of the UK without its own elected parliament.”
Online Yessers pointed out that the results of the poll, whenever they emerge, will not be comparable with other polls on independence support due to its unusual questions.
Public policy professor Mitchell asked: “Who dreamt up these options? Either inept or biased. Absurd options can only result in absurd interpretations.”
I would like a fuller range of options than usual binary choice but this is nonsense. https://t.co/opfO36AvYM
— James Mitchell (@ProfJMitchell) June 11, 2020
He added he would like to see a fuller range of options than the standard Yes/No – but said this particular selection was “nonsense”.
Former Labour MP Paul Sweeney told the professor “it’s time” to adjust polling beyond the binary and while Mitchell said he agreed, alternative options “need to be developed”.
He went on: “Calls for federalism designed simply for a press release are no longer acceptable."
Until the study’s results are published it will not be known who commissioned it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel