Alok Sharma has received a negative test result for coronavirus after appearing visibly ill in the House of Commons chamber, a spokeswoman for the Business Secretary has said.
But the spokeswoman did not immediately respond when asked if the Cabinet member will have to continue to self-isolate, with concerns that tests may not come back positive in the early stages of infection.
"Business Secretary Alok Sharma has received a negative result after being tested for coronavirus yesterday," she said on Thursday.
"Mr Sharma would like to thank the Parliamentary authorities and Speaker and also for the kind words from Parliamentary colleagues and others who have expressed their well-wishes over the last 24 hours."
Earlier in the day, Downing Street said Boris Johnson may have to self-isolate if Sharma does test positive after they met in No 10 this week.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the PM and Chancellor Rishi Sunak held a 45-minute socially distanced meeting on the economy with Sharma on Tuesday.
The spokesman said Johnson would follow medical advice if spoken to by contact tracers who would begin their work if Sharma's test for Covid-19 comes back positive.
Downing Street said the Government was not reconsidering its move to end virtual voting in the Commons, despite the Business Secretary appearing visibly ill in the chamber on Wednesday.
The spokesman said: "Should the Secretary of State receive a positive test, then he will work with the test and trace service to share information about his recent interactions.
"He did attend a meeting in No 10, which took place before Cabinet. That was a discussion on the economy and in terms of who was present, it was the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the Business Secretary."
He stressed the meeting took place with two-metre distancing in place and pointed towards the Government guidelines on how the tracers operate, which include asking individuals whether they had been to a workplace recently.
The spokesman confirmed that even those who have had Covid-19 must isolate and, when pressed on whether the PM would self-isolate if told to, he said: "I would expect us to take medical advice and to follow it."
As a way of slowing the virus's spread, contact tracers with the NHS service are asking infected individuals who they have come into recent contact with.
Tracers will then decide whether it is necessary to tell those contacts to self-isolate for 14 days from their last contact with the individual, as a precaution.
Sharma was tested for Covid-19 and entered self-isolation after he was seen mopping his brow while struggling at the despatch box during the second reading of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill.
His Cabinet colleague Grant Shapps said Sharma was "doing fine" working from home while awaiting the result, having spoken to him on Thursday afternoon, and insisted that he had "always been two metres apart" from the PM.
The PCS union, representing about 800 of Parliament's clerks, security guards and kitchen staff, wrote to the PM highlighting the case in saying the decision to end virtual voting was endangering the workers.
"We believe Parliament has opened too soon and the lives of PCS members, and those of our sister unions, are being put at risk unnecessarily," general secretary Mark Serwotka wrote.
The feared case of Covid-19 in the chamber came a day after MPs approved the Government's plan to end virtual voting in the Commons, prompting renewed calls for the system to return.
MPs on Thursday challenged Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg for ending virtual voting, with Labour criticising the "shambolic" long queues MPs have to form to vote which have been dubbed the "coronavirus conga".
Senior Conservatives, opposition groups and the equalities watchdog raised concerns the decision to end digital voting would prevent many representatives, particularly the elderly and vulnerable ones who are shielding, from being able to vote.
But Lewis denied that Sharma's case supported the argument for virtual voting in the Commons to be resumed.
"It is important for parliamentarians to be able to properly scrutinise legislation, not just for Covid but for the wider legislative agenda we have to continue with for people across the country, but to do so within proper guidelines," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel