A FRESH bid to clear the name of the man convicted of the UK's worst terrorist attack has been lodged.
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi is the only man ever convicted over the Lockerbie bombing.
A total of 270 people died in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, with many more lives destroyed by the atrocity.
Al-Megrahi, from Libya, denied involvement even after his conviction at a specailly-convened Scottish court in the Netherlands.
He was reeleased from prison in Greenock in 2009 on compassionate grounds after developing terminal cancer and died in Tripoli three years later.
Supporters maintain he was the victim of a miscarriage of justice.
It has been claimed that Iran may have been behind the attack.
Earlier this year the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission said a miscarriage of justice may have taken place and "it is in the interests of justice to refer the case to the High Court".
Today his family announced a formal appeal has been lodged with the High Court of Justiciary against his conviction.
Five senior judges are expected to hear the case later this year.
Aamer Anwar, lawyer for the family, said: "The appeal grounds we have lodged with the court are 'substantial'.
"A reversal of the verdict would deliver a damning indictment on the UK and the USA for having lived a monumental lie for over 31 years, imprisoning a man they knew to be innocent and punishing the Libyan people for a crime which they did not commit."
Al-Megrahi's son Ali commented: "The family of my late father Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi and I wish to extend gratitude to our lawyer Aamer Anwar for the great efforts he has made in bringing this case to the appeal court and for the dedication of his legal team.
"We hope from God Almighty that success will be your ally in all your steps and that you will continue along this path.
"The legal team has made great efforts and is still making in exposing the unfair trial that my father was subjected to and continues to face despite his death.
"We have faith that justice will win in the end and overturn the unlawful verdict."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel