OFFENCES of indecent communication with children have risen by more than 80% over the past five years in Scotland, according to new figures.
The data, from a Freedom of Information request by children’s charity the NSPCC, found Police Scotland recorded 651 offences of communicating indecently with a child in 2019/20.
There were 354 such crimes in 2014/15 – an increase of 84%.
With digital communications reserved to Westminster, the charity is calling on the Prime Minister to deliver legislation to ensure technology firms make their sites safer. Andy Burrows, NSPCC head of child safety online, said: “The NSPCC’s figures show that online grooming offences in Scotland have soared by 80% in the last five years.
“This absolutely underlines why the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, now has to personally commit to getting an Online Harms Bill on the statute book in the next 18 months.
“For too long, child abuse has been an inconvenient truth for tech bosses that have turned a blind eye to the risks on their site.
“That’s why it’s so important that the UK Government now steps up to keep all of our
children safe.”
The Police Scotland figures indicate the force recorded 354 indecent communication with children offences in 2014/15; 381 in 2015/16; 462 in 2016/17; 429 in 2017/18, and 581 in 2018/19.
NSPCC chief executive Peter Wanless spoke to Johnson at a hidden harms roundtable last week.
He said: “Child abuse is an inconvenient truth for tech bosses who have failed to make their sites safe and enabled offenders to use them as a playground in which to groom our kids.
“Last week the Prime Minister signalled to me his determination
to stand up to Silicon Valley and make the UK the world leader in online safety.
“He can do this by committing to an Online Harms Bill that puts a legal duty of care on big tech to pro-actively identify and manage safety risks.
“Now is the time to get regulation done and create a watchdog with the teeth to hold tech directors criminally accountable if their platforms allow children to come to serious but avoidable harm.”
The UK Government was contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel