A SENIOR MEP has told MSPs the European Union will not push for a post-Brexit agreement with Britain “at all costs”
David McAllister, who chairs the UK Coordination Group in the European Parliament, said that if there is no prospect of an agreement between the UK and the EU on their future relationship, talks could be concluded.
His warning came yesterday as he gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament’s Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs committee.
He said implementing the withdrawal agreement was “utterly important” for negotiating the future partnership between Britain and the bloc.
However, he added: “We have to prepare our businesses and citizens on both sides for changes that will take place on the first of January 2021 – if we have an agreement, or if we don’t have an agreement.”
McAllister said it was an “open secret” in Brussels than any request from the UK for the current Brexit transition period to be extended would be agreed, although the Christian Democrat MEP stressed “we certainly need more time” for the talks to take place. He said: “It is an open secret that if the UK were to ask for an extension I don’t think the EU would say no, but we have to accept it takes two to tango,” he said.
McAllister said it was “disappointing” from a European perspective that “no real progress has been achieved” despite the three rounds of negotiations which had already taken place.
“We will not drive for an agreement to be done at all costs,” he said. “We are making an offer and it is up to the UK to accept if they want this offer or not.
“If we are still at odds in the very vital issues then ... we will then have to think how we continue our negotiations in the second half.”
He said the EU had adopted a negotiating framework for a “comprehensive partnership between both sides”.
And he added: “There will be no more cherry picking. We experienced this over many, many years and in the end, it wasn’t satisfactory for both sides.
“Unfortunately, I’m saying that as somebody who feels very close at heart to the UK. Unfortunately, our ambition hasn’t been matched by that of the UK Government. At least until now. Nevertheless, I welcome the belated publication of the UK Government of a series of legal texts, covering quite a number of areas … I think this is an important step in transparency, accountability, towards citizens.”
READ MORE: Brexit: Scottish ministers to restart preparations for No Deal
Joan McAlpine, the committee convener, said: “It is a bleak picture and it almost sounds as if an agreement can’t be reached we could see an end to negotiations in June, if the UK doesn’t ask for an extension.”
McAllister also highlighted the effects the coronavirus pandemic was having on negotiations, as the lead negotiators could not meet for talks: “Video conferences, as we are all experiencing these weeks, is the second best option, but when it comes to very sensitive issues, politically sensitive issues, what you don’t have at the moment is the chief negotiators could confidentially talk to each other behind closed doors. This option isn’t possible at the moment and this is an additional difficult point.”
He said that with the pandemic leaving nations facing the “largest challenge since the Second World War, the largest economic crisis since the 1930s”, there would be “understanding” if the UK sought an extension.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel