I HAVE seldom witnessed in politics a more shameful episode than the Cummings affair. I’ve always thought Boris Johnson unprincipled and mendacious. But, when I watched him at his press conference, I was appalled – especially by his claim that Dominic Cummings followed his “instinct as a father”.
It was to misunderstand, deliberately, the questions being asked of him. All of us have an instinct to be with, protect, and care for those we love. We’ve been putting aside that instinct, however, because we accepted that our sacrifices have been for the common good.
My own mum is in her 90s and in a respite home following a protracted stay in hospital. She is desperate to get back to her flat. She is even more desperate to see her two sons. Despite this, for these long weeks, I have been unable to visit and now the nurses tell me that she has stopped eating and seems deeply depressed. I feel a huge sense of responsibility, and I feel too that I am letting her down, even though I know I have no other choice.
READ MORE: Westminster leaders unite in call for Boris Johnson to sack Dominic Cummings
This is not an issue of right or left. It’s a matter of justice. I try not to be a tribal politician after many years as a journalist where my personal allegiances had to come second to the story. And I know that there are many decent Conservative MPs who have gone on the record to say that the behaviour of the Prime Minister is indefensible. But equally, the behaviour of the Cabinet is craven.
Over the past few days, I have received scores of e-mails from constituents – some of whom have lost loved ones – deeply angered by the behaviour of Dominic Cummings, and the Prime Minister who rushed to his defence.
I have no way of knowing how this will unfold. Boris Johnson has an 80-seat majority. If he wants to he can probably brazen this out. But it brings the rule of law into disrepute. And, for me, it once again emphasises how important it is that we get to choose our own path as a country away from the toxic political culture embedded at Westminster.
John Nicolson is the MP for Ochil and South Perthshire
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel