HOW we come out of the Covid-19 pandemic and emerge, blinking into the “new normal”, has spurred one academic to wonder how “new” the concept actually is.
Frank Rennie, a professor of sustainable rural development at Lews Castle College UHI, delivered the first online course from there in 1993 and, while the establishment was advanced, today’s online connectivity “is like comparing NASA with stone-age technology”.
However, he said that small step for man was a giant leap for developing the network of colleges that became the University of the Highlands and Islands.
Not too long after that, rudimentary digital resources were developed for the university’s first networked degree, and the rest is history.
Writing on the UHI blog, Rennie said: “Suddenly there are fewer options for learning and teaching. Suddenly, even colleagues who have been reticent to put anything online are seeing the advantages of being able to use educational technology to communicate in a semi-normal way with students and other staff members.”
He said that among his observations after 11 weeks working from home, was most of his workload had continued as normal, without the commute and corridor confabs, as all his teaching is through UHI’s own virtual learning environment.
Discussions with research students are by video conference, as are network and committee meetings. Online learning had now become mainstream, with tutor-student online communication, and that between professionals, almost normalised.
“From being an ‘alternative’, it has become mainstream and some of the anticipated demons and obstacles have faded or disappeared,” he said.
“Secondly, the shift online means that I am now even MORE connected with the wider world of academia than I was previously … The geographic argument of population numbers and transport links that make Inverness, Edinburgh, and Glasgow (to name but three cities) venues of convenience for meetings of physical networks and committees, is now destabilised.”
Rennie said many were finding the new normal “incredibly efficient and cost-effective,” and added: “Whether this revelation becomes sufficiently embedded to survive and thrive beyond the immediate lockdown will be interesting to observe. For my part, as an early convert, I would prefer not to regress to old ways.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel