SO Sarah Smith has been forced to apologise to the FM for her disgraceful “opinion” piece on BBC News when she defamed the First Minister by saying she “enjoyed” making lockdown policy (‘I said enjoyed by mistake’: Sarah Smith apologises for Nicola Sturgeon claim, thenational.scot, May 19).
She has only been forced to apologise because of the outcry about it, calling it a “mistake” except for the fact she used this piece on the six o’clock news and it was repeated in a different location in the dark on the 10 o’clock news – so in all that time she did not realise her “mistake” or she just went with it anyway and then only after the backlash decided to apologise.
Perhaps Smith should be apologising live on air at the same time as the original broadcast – or is a Twitter apology the easy way out.
Winifred McCartney
Paisley
THE Beeb has done it again, they can’t resist a pop at Nicola. This time via the mouth of Sarah Smith.
Yesterday evening, on the six o’clock news she accused the First Minister of playing politics and using the Scottish people as pawns. Her suggestion that the continuing lockdown is merely to show that Scotland is different from the rest of the UK is outrageous.
The FM has not been drawn into making a Boris Johnson-style, ill-thought-out announcement that has no substance and which creates many more questions that it gives answers, again forcing the whole of the Westminster Cabinet into defending the indefensible.
For instance, Mr Gove stated at the weekend that if problems arise by returning children to school then they will be dealt with. Is this planning or “suck it and see”?
Mike Underwood
Linlithgow
I CANNOT be the only who was disgusted at Boris Johnson’s shameless attempt to switch the blame for the performance of his government during the Covid-19 pandemic to his public servants.
I don’t need to repeat these failings: ignoring the scientific advice given in 2016, and repeated in 2018, that we were ill-prepared for a pandemic; social distancing and lockdown implemented too little and too late; stopping testing and tracing; failure to provide sufficient quality personal protective equipment, especially to the care sector; failure to test at our borders; loading the advisory body Sage with political appointees; and more.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson faces growing Tory backbench rebellion
As an ex-public servant myself, I have always valued the independence of the administration (the public service) from the executive (the government). The role of the civil service is the implement the political will of the government, but also to offer analysis of the consequences of policies. The clear agenda of Dominic Cummings and Johnson is to remove the checks and balances that an independent civil service has delivered, a system which, though not perfect, has worked reasonably well for decades, in favour of a country run by the political elite.
The Tory party have more than four years left of their mandate in which to implement their agenda. I urge my friends south of the Border to oppose the propaganda of the anti-civil service agenda. Scotland has its own way out. We say no to a Westminster-led elected dictatorship.
We will become independent.
Pete Rowberry
Duns
CLEARLY it’s an appalling situation when care home staff are potentially avoiding coronavirus testing because a positive test might result in them having to exist on £96 per week statutory sick pay. What is worse, I understand that some 25% of care home workers are on zero-hour contracts and may receive no payment at all if they have to self-isolate.
I accept that the GMB’s secretary, Gary Smith, should approach the Scottish Government to seek help for the affected workers placed in an invidious financial position. What I wonder is, why is Mr Smith concentrating his considerable ire on the Government and what is he doing to tackle wealthy care home owners who are making a fortune charging residents around £1000 per week while paying their staff a pittance?
Douglas Turner
Edinburgh
ISN’T it typical of the Tories to get wound up by the use of so-called bad language – just to distract everyone from their actions (or more often their inactions).
So what if Ian Blackford shared a funny post on Facebook which had a sweary word in it – so did I and so did probably thousands of ordinary people who have a sense of humour. Yet one Tory MSP is upset about it.
Well what upsets me is the thousands of people dying from coronavirus due to the inaction of the UK Tory Government trying to pursue their herd-immunity policy. Thousands of needless deaths – almost half of them unreported in official UK Government reports while daily we get one Tory minister after another lying to the public in their so-called press briefings.
It must be a strange world to be a Tory where a sweary word can upset you so much but you remain silent in the deaths of thousands.
Cllr Kenny MacLaren
Paisley
IS the potential for creating huge profits for pharmaceutical companies holding back research for a coronavirus cure? There are dozens of research groups working independently all over the world desperately trying to find a reliable vaccine and jealously guarding their data.
Whoever pops out of the box first will stand to gain enormous revenues from a cure. Clearly one thing they do not want to do is share research which you would think would lead to a cure sooner rather than later. I would hope that there are some community-minded research groups that would be more inclined to publish their research for the good of us all.
Mike Herd
Highland
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel