DOWNING Street has refused to join criticism of Donald Trump’s decision to halt US funding of the World Health Organisation during the coronavirus pandemic.
The US president has accused the international body of “severely mismanaging and covering up” the spread of the coronavirus.
He said his administration would suspend funding of up to £400 million a year for the organisation.
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director-general, said: “The United States of America has been a longstanding and generous friend to the WHO, and we hope it will continue to be so.
“We regret the decision of the President of the United States to order a halt in funding to the World Health Organisation.”
He added: “With support from the people and government of the United States, the WHO works to improve the health of many of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable people.
“WHO is not only fighting Covid-19. We’re also working to address polio, measles, malaria, Ebola, HIV, tuberculosis, malnutrition, cancer, diabetes, mental health and many other diseases and conditions.”
Downing Street defended the WHO’s role and said the UK was not planning to follow Trump’s lead, adding that the organisation was playing an important role in tackling the spread of the virus.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “Our position is that the UK has no plans to stop funding the WHO, which has an important role to play in leading the global health response.
“Coronavirus is a global challenge and it’s essential that countries work together to tackle this shared threat.”
READ MORE: MP furious after Sky bosses accused of dismissing staff coronavirus concerns
Asked if the UK Government was disappointed by Trump’s move – which has been widely criticised around the world – the spokesman said: “I can only set out the UK’s position and that is we have no plans to stop funding the WHO.”
The UK’s funding for the organisation was based on an assessment of what it needed, something that was kept under review but was not affected by other countries’ decisions, the spokesman said. The Government “wants to see the WHO continue to learn lessons on how to improve its response to global health emergencies” and the spokesman called for “transparent and accurate” information about the virus.
“We want to work with all parts of the international community – including China – to ensure a joined-up response to the pandemic,” he said.
Speaking at a press briefing,
Ghebreyesus said the WHO was reviewing the impact on its work of any withdrawal of US funding and will work with partners to “fill any financial gaps we face and to ensure our work continues uninterrupted”.
He said: “Covid-19 does not discriminate between rich nations and poor, large nations and small. It does not discriminate between nationalities, ethnicities or ideologies.
“Neither do we. This is a time for all of us to be united in our common struggle against a common threat. A dangerous enemy. When we’re divided the virus exploits the cracks between us.”
He added: “My focus is on stopping this virus and saving lives.
“WHO is grateful to the many nations, organisations and individuals who have expressed their support and commitment to WHO in recent days, including their financial commitment.
“We welcome this demonstration of global solidarity.”
Trump said US taxpayers are the largest contributors to the WHO, dwarfing the amount paid by China.
He claimed the WHO had made a “disastrous” decision to oppose travel restrictions from China, but the president said his actions in ignoring that advice had saved “untold numbers of lives”.
Trump has previously accused the United Nations health agency of being “China-centric”. Scientists railed against Trump’s actions, stressing the need for international co-operation in tackling Covid-19, and hit out at the “shortsighted” move.
Dr Stephen Griffin, associate professor at the University of Leeds School of Medicine, said: “This most recent intervention in public health policy by President Trump is perhaps one of the least productive, most short-sighted, self-motivated and hypocritical acts I have ever witnessed.
As far as I can ascertain, it has no foundation in reality.
“I suspect this move has the support of precisely 0% of the US scientific and healthcare communities, and, I would hope, only a small minority of the population as a whole.”
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel