IN essence, those promoting the “herd immunity” approach to a vaccine-free pandemic are simply setting out an ordered way for those who would likely die from the viral infection to die without putting undue stress on the health systems and business world. The extended protection of those groups most at risk would eventually be lifted once they could die without unduly stressing the health system and the business world.
The alternative would appear to be putting in place resilience for the short, medium and long term, and assigning such measures locally, regionally and nationally by states, groups of states and internationally. All such measures would have to be capable of dealing with lockdown and/or global catastrophe.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson taken into intensive care with coronavirus
Think we might need a national resilience in 3D printing? Provide additional capital grant funding at nominal interest rates for businesses, who in turn retain an obligation for emergency assistance.
Think we might need a state resilience for protective clothing? Provide additional payment for preparedness inclusive of capital grants at nominal interest rates, for beyond normal levels of production, and for protracted periods.
For the avoidance of doubt, building in “resilience” is somewhat protectionist, not cheap, and is inclusive of citizens contributing to the economy, rather than being regarded simply as a form of corporate commodity.
READ MORE: Two die from coronavirus in ‘difficult 24 hours’ for Scottish Government
So now it’s up to Scotland whether to go down the expensive resilience road or the deathly austerity just-in-time road. What is clear is that as the type and nature of multiple resilience is identified, and the consequential actions are identified, business as usual is practically impossible, and the tax and support regimes that currently exist are shown to be inappropriate.
To state the obvious, an independent Scotland (EU) is required to enable such divergence from the ethos of the UK Government, who currently pursue “herd immunity” type approaches.
Stephen Tingle
Greater Glasgow
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel