CARDS on the table, I’m not a No to Yes voter: I am a Yes to No to Yes voter. I voted Yes in the first Scottish independence referendum. I was caught up in the Caledonia fever, I was out of school, it was a halcyon summer and I was ready for a new future for Scotland.
My support for independence was born not out of any negative view of England or the Union in particular, but in a somewhat romantic belief that maybe it was right that we, the Scots, were in control of our own wee hills and glens.
It was after the loss, towards the end of the year with the emergence of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader, and another future that seemed to be dawning in Westminster politics that my precocious Yes changed to a firm No.
I would have by no means described myself as an ardent Unionist, but I came to see Scotland becoming independent as abandoning and therefore condemning people like me, who happened to live in England, Liverpool, Manchester, and London, to generations of Tory rule.
READ MORE: From No To Yes: ‘For me, Brexit was the pivotal point’
Scotland stood with these areas against Thatcherism in the 80s, a time when the economic heart was ripped out of working communities the length and breadth of the country, regardless of national allegiances. I came to the conclusion that I could not assent to abandoning the millions of people like me who do not support south-east centric neo-liberalism, but because of their location 200 miles south of the Scottish border they could not pull the same eject cord and free themselves of Tory Westminster rule.
Then I turned back. A major turning point on my journey to be an ardent Yes supporter was the Brexit vote in 2016. On the morning of June 24 I was absolutely shell-shocked. I was disgusted and disappointed.
I did not see how the UK could have swallowed the story of its own exceptionalism so much so as to leave the most successful peace project in the history of the world and most effective economic area on the planet in order to satisfy a strange desire to “take back control”. I understand the EU is not perfect, but Brexit is going to be an unmitigated disaster.
READ MORE: From No to Yes: 'Why we need a credible plan for Independence'
The final nail in the coffin was the election result of December 2019. I worked for the anti-Brexit group Our Future, Our Choice for over a year. Pouring hours of my life into trying to reverse what I think will be one of the most profound political acts of self-harm a country has inflicted on itself.
After months of Westminster wrangling, when we got an election I was hopeful. Reading the exit polls, my heart broke. A “stonking majority” had been won for the Conservatives. The fight to stay in Europe was effectively over. Labour heartlands across the country fell into Conservative control. The very people I felt I would have been abandoning had inflicted a final defeat on the cause I held most dear.
In the week that followed I joined the Scottish National Party, and have reaffirmed my commitment to an independent Scotland.
I don’t think of Scottish independence as turning our back on Britain, but on Britain turning its back on Scotland.
This is not the modern Britain that I grew up in – nor one that I want to be a part of.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel