THE UK Government needs to stump up an additional £22 billion to keep people in their jobs and support families as coronavirus spreads, a think tank has found.
A statutory retention pay scheme is needed to support struggling firms and help to prevent mass job losses, the Resolution Foundation argued.
The scheme could be modelled on maternity pay and help avoid the need for mass redundancies, enabling firms to pick up activity quickly when shutdown restrictions have eased, it said.
People who did not have work temporarily would remain formally employed by their firm, but with a significant amount of their pay covered by the state.
Firms would continue to pay workers at least two-thirds of their previous wages via their payroll, with the state providing a rebate for those payments, the think tank suggested.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon confirms six coronavirus patients have died in Scotland
Reacting to the report, the SNP’s Westminster backed proposals to extend Statutory Sick Pay to those currently ineligible, as well as supporting demands for a new Statutory Retention Pay scheme to keep people in employment.
The group’s MPs also called for an increase in Universal Credit and other social security benefits to protect people's incomes.
Shadow work and pensions secretary Neil Gray said: "The proposals by the Resolution Foundation must be taken seriously. As must cross-party calls to use the tax system to ensure everyone has access to an emergency Universal Basic Income, and Statutory Sick Pay levels that at least meet the EU average and are extended to all workers, including self-employed and lower earners.
"I urge the UK government to meet with opposition parties and urgently deliver this support as part of a wide-ranging multi-billion financial package to protect the incomes of all our people."
READ MORE: MPs vow to keep Parliament open despite coronavirus threat
Under the Resolution Foundation scheme, people working in sectors critically affected by coronavirus, such as non-food retail, hotels and restaurants, airlines, travel operators, cleaners and personal services, account for around a fifth of the workforce.
But working from home is less viable in many of these jobs compared with higher-paid, white-collar jobs.
The foundation, whose work is focused on improving the living standards of people on low to middle incomes, said wider support is also needed to limit the hit to families' living standards.
Unemployment support should be increased alongside an extension of statutory sick pay, it said.
The foundation's report estimates that its suggested combined package of a new statutory retention pay scheme, increased unemployed support, wider uprating of benefits and extending statutory sick pay could cost around £22 billion.
Chief executive Torsten Bell said: "In order to avoid mass redundancies in affected sectors, new statutory retention pay would allow firms to put workers on paid leave with the state paying them at least two-thirds of their wages during the shutdown. This will ensure they can pick things up quickly when conditions improve.
"But the scale of the economic shock facing the country means that many families are going to rely on our social security safety net over the coming months - a safety net that has shrunk considerably over the past decade. To address this, the Government should increase unemployment support by a third to £100 a week.
"This approach would show the Government is committed to doing whatever it takes to support family budgets, and cushion the living standards hit from the wider economic shock."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here