A FORMER Scottish Government official who has accused Alex Salmond of attempted rape and sexual assault has denied she had a consensual sexual encounter with him.
Giving evidence on the third day of the trial, she said: "I have never been a willing participant of Alex Salmond's advances towards me."
Shelagh McCall QC, representing Salmond, said the pair had a consensual sexual encounter at Bute House in August 2013.
She added: "Mr Salmond says he did have an encounter with you, of a sexual nature with you, but it was in August 2013."
McCall asked the woman if she had unbuttoned Salmond's shirt and kissed him in a bedroom in Bute House before taking down his trousers.
She said: "When you went into the Connery bedroom and Mr Salmond followed you in, did you start to unbutton Mr Salmond's shirt?
"Did you kiss him and he kiss you back?
"Did you undo your trousers? Did you help pull his trousers down towards his knees?
"Because is the truth of the matter that Mr Salmond's underpants were not down, just his trousers, during this encounter."
But the woman said: "Absolutely not, as I have got this horrific image of him being fully aroused and lying over me."
McCall said the encounter had ended when the woman said to Salmond that she had not "meant this to happen".
She added: "I am putting to you that's exactly what you said at that point.
"The two of you sat up, put your clothes back on, realised it was a mistake."
But the woman said: "Absolutely not, it sounds a much better ending of an evening than what actually happened."
McCall said the woman had been "embarrassed and upset" but Salmond told her not to worry.
But the woman said: "That's not true."
A guest at Bute House has said a former Scottish Government official was at dinner the evening Alex Salmond is alleged to have tried to rape her.
The complainer, known as Woman H, claims the incident took place in June 2014.
Salmond's lawyer had previously argued she had not been at the dinner.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article