THE SNP must take a "legitimate and legal route" for Scotland to gain independence, the party's Westminster leader has said.
Ian Blackford has dismissed some calls from within the SNP for a "plan B" in the face of the UK Government's continued refusal to allow a second independence referendum.
Long-serving MP Angus MacNeil has argued an SNP majority victory in next year's Holyrood election should be seen as a mandate for independence if Boris Johnson continues to block a second referendum.
Speaking about Scottish independence at a London School of Economics (LSE) debate society event, Blackford stressed to "see this through" the party would have to adopt a "legitimate and legal route".
He said the "path and destination of Scotland's independence can only ever be found through the democratic will of our people".
Blackford said it was via this "path of persuasion" that a majority of Scots would come round to leaving the rest of the UK.
READ MORE: Michael Gove 'bullying Electoral Commission over indyref question'
He also said the UK "in its entirety, is immersed in a constitutional crisis" as a result of Brexit.
The Ross, Skye and Lochaber MP added: "The United Kingdom that Scotland voted to remain part of 2014 no longer exists.
"The union on these islands, as once was, is simply no more."
Warning a no-deal Brexit was "still very much hanging over our people and our businesses", Blackford said: "Scotland's economic interests are no longer served by being a part of this union.
"The landscape of the last decade – of austerity, of Brexit, of deep uncertainty and instability – has come at a great cost.
"It is therefore little wonder that more and more of our citizens are seeking to escape that prolonged austerity and escape Brexit.
"Rather than the instability and limitations offered by the UK, an independent country now offers the Scottish people both stability and opportunity."
He added: "If the 2016 Brexit referendum was the moment when our political futures met a point of divergence, we are now at the cusp of a moment of decision for Scotland's people."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel