A FORMER Scottish Government official who has accused Alex Salmond of sexual assault said she was "too scared" to call for help at Bute House.
The former first minister of Scotland is on trial at the High Court in Edinburgh over accusations of sexual assault.
The woman, who is the first to give evidence, has spoken about two alleged incidents, including one charge that the 65-year-old tried to rape her in June 2014.
Shelagh McCall QC, representing Salmond, asked on Tuesday why the woman had not called for a security guard to help that night.
The prosecution witness, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said: "I really wish that I had. I was scared, I was embarrassed and humiliated.
"Looking back I wish I had screamed, I wish I had physically reacted but I just turned to stone."
McCall QC had earlier asked whether the woman had been encouraged by others to speak to Police Scotland after reports emerged in August 2018 that Salmond was being investigated.
The court heard the woman had been in contact with a number of people before talking to police.
She said: "There's no-one cheerleading me to do this. This isn't fun, I would rather not be here.
"I don't feel like I have been encouraged, I feel I have made this decision on my own."
It was also heard the witness had been in contact with someone in 2015 about a personal political project in which she said she would work with Salmond again, around a year after the alleged sexual assaults were said to take place.
The court heard the witness, known as Woman H, had been in contact with another complainer in the case, known as Woman J.
Text messages apparently sent between the two were shown in court.
The messages were said to have been exchanged after the allegations about Salmond surfaced in newspapers and discussed the "AS stuff".
An apparent text from Woman H to Woman J shown in court said: "I have a plan. And means we can be anonymous but see strong repercussions."
Woman H said the repercussions were to do with the party and police taking action.
The witness earlier told the court she began to suffer flashbacks after the Harvey Weinstein scandal emerged.
She said: "I had started to learn about (the MeToo movement), yes. It was just around that time.
"It was on the back of the Harvey Weinstein case.
"These issues started to be discussed and I started to have what I could describe as flashbacks."
The woman previously told the court on Monday that she felt "hunted" by Salmond moments before an alleged attempted rape in Bute House.
Evidence was also given about an alleged sexual assault in Bute House beforehand in May 2014.
Salmond faces 14 charges of alleged offences against 10 women, all of which he has pleaded not guilty to.
The charges span a period between June 29, 2008 and November, 11 2014, with one sexual assault said to have taken place in the month of the Scottish independence referendum in September 2014.
The trial, before judge Lady Dorrian, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article