BORIS Johnson’s plans for a multi-billion pound tunnel between Scotland and Northern Ireland have been slammed by a leading economic think tank.

The Fraser of Allander Institute (FAI) said it would not deliver the economic benefits claimed, would clash with climate change objectives and the cash could be better spent on other things.

The Prime Minister previously said serious consideration is being given to building a bridge between Portpatrick and Larne in Northern Ireland.

But last week Scottish Secretary Alister Jack said he favoured a tunnel – and claimed Johnson is “on exactly the same page”.

He said a tunnel would boost the economies of both regions and strengthen the Union, and could be built by 2030.

READ MORE: Tories' £20bn 'Boris Bridge' plans mocked by leading economists

And he claimed it would also better address some of the problems associated with the deep, stormy North Channel – part of which was used as a Second World War munitions dump.

He said: “It’s no different to the tunnels connecting the Faroes, it’s not different to the tunnels underneath the fjords, and it deals with the problem of Beaufort’s Dyke and the World War Two munitions. The bridge for me is a euphemism for a link, which is a tunnel.”

But the FAI dismissed the idea, which it noted was “not an April Fool”.

It said: “It won’t deliver the economic boost some claim, it isn’t a priority, it would go to the wrong location, it wouldn’t be consistent with climate change objectives, and the money could be better spent on other things. Apart from that, it’s a cracking idea.”

The FAI said those hoping the 21-mile road link would be a catalyst for faster economic growth in both Scotland and Northern Ireland “will be sorely disappointed”.

READ MORE: WATCH: Scottish Secretary says 'Boris Bridge' is a 'euphemism'

It said improving how people move around Scotland’s cities is a higher priority – and pointed out it still takes two and a half hours to travel between Aberdeen and Glasgow. The think tank said the proposed bridge or tunnel would not actually link up centres of economic activity.

It added: “Instead, travellers will arrive in rural Dumfries and Galloway or Argyll, with a 90+ mile drive to the central belt (at least a further two and a half hours).

“This won’t improve connectivity to the point where any hope of clustering or agglomeration economic effects could be expected to take hold.”

The economists said the estimated cost of around £20 billion would be equivalent to more than 14 Queensferry Crossings and could be “far better spent”.

SNP MSP Tom Arthur said: “If Boris Johnson has £20 billion to spend on infrastructure then we’re happy to send him some suggestions. But, as the Fraser of Allander Institute rightly point out, a road bridge – or a tunnel – across the Irish Sea is hardly a priority.”