THE Scottish Government has been urged by campaigners to choose a deposit return scheme based upon the Nordic variable model.
Polls by Norstat covering Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway found at least 97% of people in those countries agreed their respective schemes are easy to use and understand.
Support for the schemes – with each deposit levied on drinks containers based on their size and material – reached 99% in the Sweden and Norway studies.
When asked if a variable deposit was fairer for shoppers, 87% agreed in Finland with the other results at 81% in Sweden, 78% in Norway and 70% in Denmark.
A deposit return scheme is set to be introduced in Scotland next April.
The polls carried out last month were commissioned by the international coalition Nature 2030.
READ MORE: Deposit return scheme: Pub body calls for handling fee change
Spokesman Neil Garrick-Maidment said: “Deposit return schemes done right can dramatically reduce plastic pollution and boost recycling.
“The Scottish Government has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to tackle the waste crisis across the country.
“Scandinavia is showing the way forward. We’d be mad not to follow their example.”
Dr Sian Henley, marine science lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, also welcomed the results. She said: “The introduction of the Scottish deposit return scheme will be a crucial step in moving the country towards a real circular economy.
“It’s vital we get it right by adopting an all-in approach. We can learn a lot from countries that have had schemes in place for a number of years.
“It is clear that the models used across the Nordic nations are popular with shoppers and instrumental in promoting recycling, and can act as world-class examples for Scotland to follow.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel