ONE of Holyrood’s most prominent backbench politicians has announced he is to stand again.
John Mason, who represents Glasgow Shettleston, told The National that he is ready to serve another term in the Scottish Parliament.
On a second independence referendum, he said he was “in the patient camp” and that a new vote should not be called until support for independence was at 60% or 70%.
“I think we need to build support for independence. I’d like to see the polls well ahead before we call a referendum, maybe 60/40 or 70/30, that would have a lot of effect,” he said.
“It would tell Westminster that’s what we want, it would show the international community and it would put pressure on Westminster. As long as we sit at 50/50 anyone in Westminster and the wide world can say ‘it’s not very clear and we’re not going to allow it’.”
READ MORE: SNP MSP Stewart Stevenson to step down before Holyrood election
Mason, 62, said it was important that Holyrood had “independent minded” MSPs who were ready to challenge government from the backbenches.
“I have put my name in and I have a branch meeting tomorrow night and will be speaking to them. I have submitted my vetted papers to be vetted again,” he said.
“I believe I have a role to play in parliament. I am comfortable on the backbenches, questioning the government at times which I think is important not just for opposition MSPs but also for SNP MSPs.”
He added: “There is always a balance to be struck [as a member of the government party], but there is a need for some people and I think there are some people – Christine Grahame and Kenny Gibson – who do question the government and that has got to be healthy. It’s not healthy for any government to have people who just blindly follow but unity in any party is also important so there is a balance.”
Mason said he believed Holyrood needed some people in their sixties and beyond so there was a broad profile in terms of the age of MSPs.
The Glasgow MSP has at times been a controversial figure, hitting the headlines earlier this year when he said he would not represent constituents opposed to independence.
READ MORE: SNP MSP Gail Ross to step down at 2021 election
He sparked fury with a tweet in January in which he said he would “not be speaking up for constituents” who did not share his views on the constitution and tax. But later clarified his comment and said he was “happy to represent” others.
He was also embroiled in a row over Orange marches in Glasgow and his support for restricting them. In a debate with social media users, Mason said it was his job to “speak up for those who are suffering from multiple Orange marches”.
Yesterday he said if re-elected he would not shy away from controversial and sensitive issues.
His colleague James Dornan (above), who represents Glasgow Cathcart, had campaigned to combat sectarianism and he said he hoped it was a cause he could further.
“I’m not intentionally going to look for controversy but I won’t shy away from it if I feel there is an issue that should be raised,” he said.
READ MORE: SNP's Bruce Crawford to step down at 2021 Holyrood election
“I would like to see sectarianism addressed, that is very much a priority for me. It’s a problem that’s been there for 300 years. It’s not going to be dealt with overnight but it must be kept on the table as one of the issues we have to deal with.”
He also said he would continue to oppose any moves to legalise assisted dying should the issue be raised again in Holyrood after 2021.
Six SNP MSPs have announced they are standing down ahead of the Holyrood election in May next year. Stewart Stevenson, Michael Russell, Bruce Crawford, James Dornan, Richard Lyle and Gail Ross have all said they will not be standing, as well as former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson, Labour’s Neil Findlay and the Greens’ John Finnie.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel